You left out Tyler Styer. If the team consisted of five wild cards, he'd be my third pick, behind Shane and Skyler, and yes, he'd beat Earl in a long race right now, not that it matters.
In the past, when some complained about how fields were filled in their invitationals, Matchroom offered that they wanted to turn over a leaf and make invitations based on merit. In their three invitationals year to date (Premier League Pool, World Pool Masters, World Cup of Pool), they've delivered in a big way, rewarding those that kept their Matchroom nine-ball ranking high. Pool is once again a meritocracy. At long last, fields are no longer filled on sentiment, but instead on merit.
I have already taken note of the fact that Earl is still a good player but a Mosconi spot is earned through playing excellence during the competitive year. I wonder how you know what Earl's current speed is given that he has barely hit a ball in competition this year? The only time I saw him play this year was at Turning Stone and he didn't show me much form, tying for seventh in an event having a very weak field.
Though his selection a year ago was an insult to our collective intelligence, I did feel sad for him when he had to quarantine rather than play, and if he's selected, at least a little part of me will be happy for him. That said, I'd rather see the spot be allocated on competitive merit, even if I had to contribute significantly to a GoFundMe to get Earl the money he'd have made.