Hardships of Professional Pool as a Career

Maybe someday folks will realize sports are supported by spectators. We are stuck in a paradigm.

if you mean viewers, yes. filling seats won't do it for sports like pool or snooker. there's a lot of tv viewers of chinese 8-ball, but curiously very few spectators. good money in it because of the viewers and ad revenue/sponsors.
 
I've heard that the PBTA/RJR (Camel Tour) "relationship" has been used in business schools as an example of how not to do sponsorship.
Watched one of their tournaments recently, appears they started the 4.5 inch pockets, not shimmed on those amf tables.
 
I know of a second tier "pro" that rarely cashes (except in local events) but plays all over the world because he has the luxury of coming from a wealthy family.
Are you referring to Hunter Lombardo? He's the only "2nd tier" pro I can think of who travels the world
 
I know of a second tier "pro" that rarely cashes (except in local events) but plays all over the world because he has the luxury of coming from a wealthy family.
Glad to see that you have pro in quotes, for the player you describe is not a pro at all. Those who regularly play in pro events in which they have less than a 20% chance to cover their expense are, in my view, not pros, but instead hobbyists.
 
if you mean viewers, yes. filling seats won't do it for sports like pool or snooker. there's a lot of tv viewers of chinese 8-ball, but curiously very few spectators. good money in it because of the viewers and ad revenue/sponsors.
The Mosconi Cup spectators were a big part of 'The Show'. It was appealing to the viewers. The ruffians, the clowns, the beer drinkers...just added some of the color needed. The pool purists may disagree but I think it will increase spectators and viewers...and that means MONEY.
 
Those who regularly play in pro events in which they have less than a 20% chance to cover their expense are, in my view, not pros, but instead hobbyists.
Exactly. And without the revenue from these "hobbyists", pro pool would be in even a worse place.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sjm
I think a major reason that professional pool has not achieved the same level of success as professional golf and tennis and Formula One is that it does not generally appeal to rich people. Not sure how to fix this.
This has been an issue in pool for decades, although you may be defining it a bit too narrowly.

I have had contact with ESPN myself over the years, so this is first-hand info.

Pool on TV didn't get bad ratings. What it had was bad demographics. Advertisers are looking to reach the 18-49 years old demographic and a high-income demographic, but the data on televised pool showed that it was reaching an older and less affluent demographic.

Nice post!
 
Exactly. And without the revenue from these "hobbyists", pro pool would be in even a worse place.
Yes, that's true, but it is the dream of event producers to grow the sport to the point that it is less reliant on the revenue generated from the dead money players. As you say, we're not there yet.
 
IMHO great pool looks boring IF you don't understand how hard it is to make it look boring.

They have no tough shots... yes we all know why that is (great cue ball control), but those not "in the know" just think it looks boring.

Hell if it looks easy people think it is easy. Why watch an easy sport?

Sometimes I even get sick of seeing pros just play easy shots so I'll tune into matches between less skilled players. Don't get me wrong, I thoroughly appreciate great pool, but I can actually learn more at times watching mere mortals.
 
IMHO great pool looks boring IF you don't understand how hard it is to make it look boring.

They have no tough shots... yes we all know why that is (great cue ball control), but those not "in the know" just think it looks boring.

Hell if it looks easy people think it is easy. Why watch an easy sport?

Sometimes I even get sick of seeing pros just play easy shots so I'll tune into matches between less skilled players. Don't get me wrong, I thoroughly appreciate great pool, but I can actually learn more at times watching mere mortals.
You have a very good point here. The casual spectator has no idea how difficult pool is because it looks relatively simple when the pros play it. I think commentators for TV events like the Mosconi Cup need to stress how difficult the game is by using telestrators to show how precise players need to be. People need to appreciate how difficult the sport is before it catches on. That's one of the reason I like Earl commentating because he always stresses how difficult the game is.
 
Last edited:
Glad to see that you have pro in quotes, for the player you describe is not a pro at all. Those who regularly play in pro events in which they have less than a 20% chance to cover their expense are, in my view, not pros, but instead hobbyists.
He plays pretty good I would say strong shortstop level.
I think in my prime I would have been competitive with him but probably not the favorite.
But he never gets past the top guys.
But hell money is not a concern and he is doing what he wants.
 
Pool is a game…not a sport. I’ve played this game a long time in my spare time. I love the game, but I don’t like checkers
 
The Mosconi Cup spectators were a big part of 'The Show'. It was appealing to the viewers. The ruffians, the clowns, the beer drinkers...just added some of the color needed. The pool purists may disagree but I think it will increase spectators and viewers...and that means MONEY.
Absolutely right!

More importantly, it was televised in both Europe and Asia. I agree that the rowdy fans add a lot to the event, creating something approaching a party atmosphere. It wouldn't be the Mosconi without them. One watching the event might actually think "I wish I was there" but few pool events will bring forth such emotions.

The opposite extreme in 2022 was the Premier League Pool, a superb event that offered exceptional pool but there was not a single fan in attendance and, consequently, something just didn't feel right.
 
Back
Top