It was just a thought. Like most that attend we are looking for a much needed improvement that’s all.You’ll lose a considerable number of entries thereby losing any payout gains.
Lou Figueroa
but you would
definitely finish
earlier lol
It was just a thought. Like most that attend we are looking for a much needed improvement that’s all.You’ll lose a considerable number of entries thereby losing any payout gains.
Lou Figueroa
but you would
definitely finish
earlier lol
Get off your knees, you are embarrassing yourself.Yeah I hate matchroom is making the game more popular then it’s ever been. That because of them the pro’s are playing in professional arenas making better money then they have in 30 years. That because of them the amount of pro tournaments has tripled. God matchroom sucksnit
If you were a pro you wouldn’t think match room is bad But your a clueless basement champion instead. Grow up peter Pan. I’m not on my knees. I’m stating facts.Get off your knees, you are embarrassing yourself.
You want to know what Caesars throws in? A pizza place that hasn't been open in at least 3 years!Great info!
Thanks, Large. Have to wonder what Caesars throw in.
Lou Figueroa
Well, straight from the horse's mouth at about 16:39:Here is an interview I did with Greg several years ago talking about buy back vs double elimination and the money for master of the table (starts about 13 minute in.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qQCWA9LFhu0
So minimally you need either more time, more tables, or a bigger place.Half the people don't buy back. In other words they take their one shot, have fun and play, and it works.
Because if everybody bought back in this tournament, I couldn't do it. I mean we got too many people
getting in. You know I don't have time and enough tables and a big enough place to run the matches.
Well, straight from the horse's mouth at about 16:39:
So minimally you need either more time, more tables, or a bigger place.
But since he has known that this is an issue for at least 9 years, and done nothing to change it, nothing will probably change.
If the buyback system is done away with or pros drop out, it won't be worth watching or caring about. MoT will be meaningless.
Contracts can be re-negotiated.presumably they have a contract with the casino and can't just change location?
It was a ranking event for 2023, but I haven't seen anything that says it was for 2024. I just checked on whether the 2024 WNT rankings chart is up yet, but it isn't. Emily Frazer's presence at the DCC 9-Ball event would seem to say it was, but ................ I find it hard to believe Diamond is willing to take a hit on its rep by allowing this situation to fester. And MR will feel some presure too since this is a ranking event.
This is my opinion only, so please take it for what it's worth...a plug nickel. It is bothersome to me to see so many make posts about "matchroom taking over this or that tournament," or "let matchroom handle it".I find it hard to believe Diamond is willing to take a hit on its rep by allowing this situation to fester. And MR will feel some presure too since this is a ranking event. I’ve heard Frazier talk enuff to know she is all but certain to push for changes If this event is to remain a ranking one.
This is only the second year I’ve watched some parts of the derby. Not impressed at all. Give me the cool professionalism of MR or top Predator events any day. As a fan, I want to see the best players. I get the Open aspect of some of these tourneys, but there has to be tighter standards.
Another thing: I can’t figure out the money payouts in tourneys like this. So less dedicated fans can’t either. Have to have some clarity on what the players are actually playing for.
I didn’t know until I became a fan again a few years ago that pool has gone thru the same chaos as boxing. Derby is a legacy event that needs to get more with the times. Some old timers won’t like it, but the players will vote with their feet.
This is my opinion only, so please take it for what it's worth...a plug nickel. It is bothersome to me to see so many make posts about "matchroom taking over this or that tournament," or "let matchroom handle it".
To hell with that. I enjoy what MR is doing. They have huge aspirations and I hope they are successful. But MR has their own niche. They DO NOT need to be the be all- end all of pro pool. Not every pro event needs to have a damn purple 5 ball.
IMO, the DCC, turning stone, and other tourneys can be great as alternatives to MR. Not just another MR event.
Bottom line is that MR might be the best thing to happen to pool since TCOM, but reality is that its Barry's pet project, and he ain't getting any younger. Whose to say when he is gone, Eddie will have the same desire to pump money into a WNT? Maybe he will, but I would rather let MR show some endurance before coronating them Lords everything pool related.
I don't understand the down side of just dumping the buy back or capping the entries. Otherwise, it's a unique event so leave it as is.not often i agree to the letter of a long post. DCC needs to find a way to still be a pro-am and action jamboree type of event without the schedule fuggup. MR could and should accept that one ranking event is different in that regard. it's not that many ranking points anyway, so i doubt it's as big an issue for them as some players and fans make it out to be. as for eddie, who doesn't really like any cue sport, we can only hope.
This is my opinion only, so please take it for what it's worth...a plug nickel. It is bothersome to me to see so many make posts about "matchroom taking over this or that tournament," or "let matchroom handle it".
To hell with that. I enjoy what MR is doing. They have huge aspirations and I hope they are successful. But MR has their own niche. They DO NOT need to be the be all- end all of pro pool. Not every pro event needs to have a damn purple 5 ball.