I know 9-ball is not 14.1, but just to provide an example of which table I know to be easier, at 67 years old, I’ve attempted 14.1 high runs in practice on both size tables many times, way more attempts/hours trying on the 9’ table.Furthermore under the title,
Which table is easier if you had to beat the ghost for $1 million?
It says,
Which table would you choose to beat the ghost race to 100 for $1MM?
I will stick with choosing the 9 ft Gold Crown with the 5+ inch pockets.
As to debating the easier table, to be honest at this point I could give a shit.
I've done the same. Spent a whole summer about 12 years ago playing 14.1 on my home GC. I think my high run that summer was 28. Then I spent 1 or 2 days on a 7' Diamond and ran 45.I know 9-ball is not 14.1, but just to provide an example of which table I know to be easier, at 67 years old, I’ve attempted 14.1 high runs in practice on both size tables many times, way more attempts/hours trying on the 9’ table.
It’s been close to a decade since I’ve been able to run more than 56 balls (4 racks) on a 9 foot 4-3/4” pocket table, but this past year I ran 110 balls on our 7 foot Diamond pro cut table. To me, there is no comparison and that’s all I need for proof.
I split my playing time on 7' Diamonds and my 4 3/8" pocket Gold Crown, all tournaments and any league play is on barbox Diamonds and all of my home play is on my GC. I'm definitely taking that spot shot on my 9' GC, I am way less likely to rattle a ball. I think because I play so much on each table that neither seems large or small. When I started playing 15 years ago 9' tables seemed huge, it felt like I needed binoculars to see the other end of the table and if I went a week without playing on a barbox they seemed tiny, now there seems to be virtually no difference, its just a pool table.The half table shot on the 7’ table is still way easier than the half table shot on the 9’ table. For all comparable shots, the OB is closer to the pocket on the 7’ table and the OB is closer to the CB on the 7’ table.
For the cash would you rather shoot one spot shot on the 7’ Diamond or on the 9’ Gold Crown? Just about anyone would choose the 7’ Diamond.
If you hit the middle they all go. So to add to your 'Diamond hatred' list is the fact that 'wipe ur feet' shots tend not to go? why should they? Hell, you missed. We have three old D'mond red labels(2 Pro, 1 PA) and they play fine. The PA has ProCuts and it plays great but if u catch much cloth going in its not falling nor should it if you it that bad. I love the GC4's we have but anything close falls in with those short shelfs.Actually, I wish the 9' Diamond Pro-Cut Pocket was exactly like the 7' Diamond Pro-Cut Pocket. The shelf is quite different between the two. The 9' would be a lot more enjoyable to play on.
My full list if you are so inclined to know:If you hit the middle they all go. So to add to your 'Diamond hatred' list is the fact that 'wipe ur feet' shots tend not to go? why should they? Hell, you missed. We have three old D'mond red labels(2 Pro, 1 PA) and they play fine. The PA has ProCuts and it plays great but if u catch much cloth going in its not falling nor should it if you it that bad. I love the GC4's we have but anything close falls in with those short shelfs.
Came home a few years ago to Campus Q and broke and ran the first 5 racks, he had just opened and once he got the heat going and the grill on i didn't make another ball on the break for over an hour. Changed break spot, speed, etc nothing helpedYes bar tables are overall easier to play real pool on. This isn't asking that exact question again though. In a normal game of 9 Ball, I will definitely miss more balls on the 9 foot table but playing the ghost is a different animal. If the table plays really easy, a 9 footer or bar table, then the most important variable is the spread of the balls after the break.
If you're using a wooden rack, then I'm really not sure which table would deliver more runnable racks after the break. If you can get away with a light break on the GC and get a nice spread. That MAY turn out easier than the Diamond BT.
I honestly think the people that are voting a 9' GC is easier than a 7' Diamond haven't played extensively on 7' Diamond.ö
You are talking about real pool. I don't deny that in general bar table pool is easier. This is more of a gaff question. I think some people are forgetting how easy a plus 5 inch pocketed Gold Crown with FRESH CLOTH plays. Broken in cloth I'd pick the DBT.I haven’t had much to say on this thread…played a lot on 12 foot, 11 foot, 10 foot, 9 foot, and oversize 8 foot.
My least experience is on 7 foot….but I’ve heard of more than a few pros gambling at sets on 7 foot and agreeing to move to a
9 foot because they were breaking and running too much on the bar box…..and it was a Diamond 7 foot.
I'm still taking the 7' .You are talking about real pool. I don't deny that in general bar table pool is easier. This is more of a gaff question. I think some people are forgetting how easy a plus 5 inch pocketed Gold Crown with FRESH CLOTH plays. Broken in cloth I'd pick the DBT.
If I had a gun to my head, maybe I still pick the bar table, but I wouldn't be shocked if the Gold Crown breaks easier and I end up doing better on it.
The diamond shelf on their 7’ is not as deep as their 9’. (Pro cut 4.5” on both). I’ve seen them side by side at the pool room.
Also a 7' Diamond's shelf is much closer to a GC shelf than a 9' Diamond. The balls don't hang like they do on a 9' Diamond.
Just to give everyone an idea of what you are talking about.Actually, I wish the 9' Diamond Pro-Cut Pocket was exactly like the 7' Diamond Pro-Cut Pocket. The shelf is quite different between the two. The 9' would be a lot more enjoyable to play on.
Thanks. It's visible in the picture that the 9' is deeper than the 7'. I think it's about 1/4" difference. I can measure in about a week I'll be at a room that has new of both.Just to give everyone an idea of what you are talking about.
Those damn plastic pocket inserts... Hate those things so much...Just to give everyone an idea of what you are talking about.
Nothing sounds better than a Brunswick pocket, never played on a drop pocket Brunswick thoughThose damn plastic pocket inserts... Hate those things so much...
A couple days ago I watched a bar table match on YouTube where Demetrius beat Vilmos Foldes. It was 8 ball at the USBTC. Foldes kept breaking dry. So that’s all he got to do. Demi ran out every game. There are other matches on YouTube. he can play on the 7’.Demetrius,
Players including yourself make it a point to not play on the 7 foot tables in favor of the "big table." Now the reasoning may be vastly different, but I am going to say the "kids table" excuse ranks fairly high.
You are currently a 722 Fargo Rate player. I see a 727 in league & local tournaments all the time along with another 719. There are many 700 plus or minus players in the Rocky Mountain Region. So don't take this as a disrespectful statement, but "professional speed" doesn't mean a hill of beans to me.
So as for being spot on - maybe there is a point where things don't jive with what "pro speed" players believe or want to hear.
Here's what I have seen in the past 25 years or so in my local pool room going from very forgiving 9 foot tables along with Valley 7ft tables to now 7ft Diamond pro cut & (1) 9ft pro cut Diamond. The gap may not be as far apart as one would want to believe between 7ft & 9ft tables depending on make, model, setup.
Big table pockets can play like a 5 gallon bucket that you pick up at your local home improvement store. Pocketing balls on a 7 ft table at times can be much more difficult in actual play.
May not be the case with the OP's two choices, but again the gap isn't that far apart imho.