You're still obviously assuming that the world in which we live hasn't been molded by the men AND the women that live in it. If only we could fix society, then magically women would play pool in equal numbers to men. This seems to be your point of view. I think it's almost exactly the opposite. Women don't find pool as interesting as men do because -- wait for it -- they are women! When you boil it all down, it's a bizarrely trivial pursuit to bang balls into each other for hours on end. To be great, you have to have a personality that is extremely single minded, bordering on autisticly obsessive. Men are much more hardwired for such mundane tasks. They have this luxury as they haven't been hardwired over hundreds of thousands of years to constantly be weary of men and even focused on the protection of their young. I imagine that the act of spreading out on a pool table in front of a room full of people illicits more anxiety out of women than men. There's just only so much we can do to make the game comfortable for women to play it.It doesn't assume these things happen randomly, it acknowledges the complete lack of neutrality, equality and equity that exist, and the incredible effort it would take to actually align these things and put them into place, as well as the lack of desire to actually do that by a vast amount of people.
Biologically they find it less interesting? I am not sure that's how it works. Societally fabricated gender norms and values define what it is to be a man or a woman. What they should do, think, feel and ultimately what they personally feel is achievable. Biological Sex has nothing to do with desire to play a game.Women don't find pool as interesting as men do because -- wait for it -- they are women!
Absolutely agree with youMen and women are different.
These differences should be celebrated not discounted.
Women's places should be protected.
In pool, they could be in the future if a context of equal opportunities can be achieved. In the current context, you are right.Women's accomplishments need not be compared to men.
... Biological Sex has nothing to do with desire to play a game.
Not without re-evolution. The differences have evolved with a stiff dose of artificial (literally) selection.Do you also think women would fish in the same numbers as men if we bought them all a rod and reel and funded a billion dollar ad campaign?
We're different.
Don't actually need any of that where I am from, as there's many females who like to fish as a hobby already, and probably a higher percentage working in the industry than most other places, but a healthy dose of advertising would likely see as many, as those who needed and organized the drive of the imposed concept, desired. I feel like the question that would adequately supplement what you put forward would be - does the world/region/those who control the relative market, feel that it is economically beneficial to encourage more? If the answer returns a 'yes', then you would promptly be led down the path of normalization of that concept.Do you also think women would fish in the same numbers as men if we bought them all a rod and reel and funded a billion dollar ad campaign?
You get points for making me laugh. Top referencing/word play.For someone that comes across as intelligently as you do -- I seriously can't believe you wrote this. I kind of thought the gender theorist types were dying out or at least sneaking back into the hedges, Homer Simpson style, and coming back out while pretending to have never espoused such things.![]()
Ah but physique plays heavily as well as maybe machismo - taking the horse to the limits. Like driving maybe. Pool doesn't seem to require any physique that women can't attain. Couple more things at work, Even the super enthused woman has been restrained for millennia from achievement let alone excellence.
Machismo in the "on the edge" sense. I mentioned car racing but anything they do - gymnastics, figure skating, shotput lol... These ladies are a specially enabled bunch and not typical of the female jock pool. Of course I have no supporting data - manz here would ask lol but my opinion nonetheless.if that were the case there wouldn't have been any world champions or olympic medalists that were women, but there have been. only there have been way more men winners. it's definitely not a sport characterized by machismo in most western countries, it's very female dominated in general.
physique, maybe a bit, but the main thing is of course the physique of the horse.
It won't end because it just started.Lasterer word.
This shoulda been here. Found it in another thread. Here it is again.
![]()
Long as we don't turn into seed pods I suppose...It won't end because it just started.
We're awaiting the "investigation" since the organization said they will look into it. Unless there is a resolution this will continue. Or after the lawsuit.
This is the way.![]()
Transgender women banned from female pool category
The Ultimate Pool Group (UPG) ban transgender women from female category after landmark UK Supreme Court ruling that the legal definition of a woman is based on biological sex.www.bbc.com
no mas
The lunacy has to stop somewhere. I'd also bet that $$$$-loss figured in big time. I heard that a lot of UP league/tourn. types were putting major heat on UP hq. They were gonna lose their ass if they didn't come to their senses.I honeslty thought it would just remain the same and and governing bodies would just ignore it to avoid any backlash from that community.