Dave, is Yapp's comment that it is virtually impossible for the cue ball to play slicker at the end of a long match than it did at the beginning reasonable?
Dave, you mention in video, that conditions were "very slick" and "much more than typical." Is your judgement that wax or cleaner was used in that match with Chua vs Yi?... unless it was sprayed or wiped down before play with a wax or lubricant like Silicone spray.
... or unless the balls were also polished before play with an unusual cleaner or wax.
I did a video many years ago showing how what your clean the balls with has a big effect:
Dave, you mention in video, that conditions were "very slick" and "much more than typical." Is your judgement that wax or cleaner was used in that match with Chua vs Yi?
You don't think throw and knowledge of throw is important??The game is not that serious to do analytical or any fancy pants studies on.
I agree with you, and I dont think it is any form of cheating at all. There can only be so much "variations" to the game to make it interesting. If you are inexperienced....then you are an inferior player, period.This is not a NEW event. Using "slickers" on the balls and cushions has been going on for at least my 65 years playing pool. Talcum and Baby powders have been around forever. In the pool room I grew up in, it was common practice to slick (juice) down the rails with powder on your hands prior to shooting difficult shots laying close to the rail and passing the side pocket towards the corner. Some players used to have powder in a towel and would act like they were wiping down the balls as they laid in the ball rack prior to racking. That would create ball sliding on the rails thus making it easier to make balls on the break. This was when we would self rack. Conversely some smart players would use a damp towel when racking the balls to "clean them" but really they were wet such that they went nowhere when broken. The light moisture on them slowed them down. Lastly having access to the air conditioning could raise or lower the humidity so the table conditions changed dramatically and only you would know it. Having a friendly house man always helped. Is this cheating? I remember when Lou Brock was attempting to break the stolen base record and teams would wet down the base path excessively so that Lou couldn't get to his top speed so quickly. MLB had to step in on that one.
Is we talkin bout baseball now??You don't think throw and knowledge of throw is important??
Is we talkin bout baseball now??You don't think throw and knowledge of throw is important??
You ducked that like a seasoned politician. If you ever tire of this game, there's always public office Doc!!To judge, I would need to study ball reactions from matches on the same table before the Chua-Yi match, which I have not done. If all matches on that table had the same reactions, I would guess the cloth was just very slick and the balls were highly polished or waxed or had some sort of other coating or surface finish which was persistent.
I assume you mean by tournament staff or refs not individual players and balls are treated the same for all matches.Ball lubing should be allowed. It's a different game but legitimately pool as well.
Absolutely. The issue is the targeted blindsiding of individual players as well as personal preferences. Maybe (unlikely) if players get accustomed to a likelihood of varying conditions they'll check first and have a viable approach by lag time. Otherwise, as long as the alterations are consistent, global announcement - on the poster for instance, should be sufficient notice.I assume you mean by tournament staff or refs not individual players and balls are treated the same for all matches.