WPA Rules Question

GideonF

GideonF

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
Apologies if this has been covered before.

In the WPA 10b doubles the issue of a player pulling balls out of the pocket before the CB stops moving came up again. This is not a case where the moving CB touches one of the balls; rather, the rule apparently is that it is a foul to take the balls out before the CB stops moving.

Ignoring for the moment whether this should be a rule, I don’t see anything in the WPA rules that makes this a foul. Can anyone point to a WPA rule or regulation that makes this a foul?
 
GideonF said:
... Ignoring for the moment whether this should be a rule, I don’t see anything in the WPA rules that makes this a foul. Can anyone point to a WPA rule or regulation that makes this a foul?
Click to expand...
This situation has been discussed before and needs to be clarified. Under the description of the "Touched Ball" foul, there is no distinction between in play and out of play. That makes intentionally touching an out-of-play ball unsportsmanlike conduct. The referee then needs to decide on a penalty. Evidently the officials in that tournament decided it should be treated like a standard foul.
 
Bob Jewett said:
This situation has been discussed before and needs to be clarified. Under the description of the "Touched Ball" foul, there is no distinction between in play and out of play. That makes intentionally touching an out-of-play ball unsportsmanlike conduct. The referee then needs to decide on a penalty. Evidently the officials in that tournament decided it should be treated like a standard foul.
Click to expand...

By that logic is moving out of play balls from one pocket to another a foul (either because one pocket is too full or because you don’t trust the plastic pocket not to spit a ball out if it is empty and hit at pace)? This was certainly common practice in past years.
 
Even better: your opponent shoots a bank at warp speed to shorten it. It flies off the table and rolls over by your chair. You pick the ball up to return it to the ref.

But one penalty for unsportsmanlike conduct is to ignore it. Another is to expel the player from the event forfeiting all prize money. The ref has to choose an appropriate penalty.
 
Bob Jewett said:
Even better: your opponent shoots a bank at warp speed to shorten it. It flies off the table and rolls over by your chair. You pick the ball up to return it to the ref.

But one penalty for unsportsmanlike conduct is to ignore it. Another is to expel the player from the event forfeiting all prize money. The ref has to choose an appropriate penalty.
Click to expand...

When the rules get revised next I would like to see a distinction between balls in play and out of play. I don’t see any reason that moving balls, or giving it to a ref, or pulling them out (as per my original question) should be a foul at all. The only harm is if the moving CB hits one, but that’s a foul anyway for touching or interfering with a ball still in play. Am I missing something?
 
Bob Jewett said:
This situation has been discussed before and needs to be clarified. Under the description of the "Touched Ball" foul, there is no distinction between in play and out of play. That makes intentionally touching an out-of-play ball unsportsmanlike conduct. The referee then needs to decide on a penalty. Evidently the officials in that tournament decided it should be treated like a standard foul.
Click to expand...
So are we to interpret his to mean if a player touches a ball at any time it's a foul. Picking up a ball off the ground even? It has always been customary for players (winner and loser of each game) to help the official by removing balls from pockets after the game is over and giving them to the referee. So now this is a foul too? If so, it is the all time stupidest rule in the history of Pool!
 
jay helfert said:
So are we to interpret his to mean if a player touches a ball at any time it's a foul. Picking up a ball off the ground even? It has always been customary for players (winner and loser of each game) to help the official by removing balls from pockets after the game is over and giving them to the referee. So now this is a foul too? If so, it is the all time stupidest rule in the history of Pool!
Click to expand...
The way I read it Bob is just saying that the current rules do in fact technically allow for those interpretations (but that promoters/refs have a lot of latitude in when/if/how to enforce it), but reading between the lines it sounds to me like he is also essentially saying he hopes that the rule gets clarified at some point so that nobody even has the option to be able to choose to interpret it in those ways, and that until then he hopes that the promoters/refs don't choose to have stupid interpretations with stupid penalties for technical violations of the rule like those you mentioned that are clearly not unsportsmanlike conduct.
 
Poolplaya9 said:
The way I read it Bob is just saying that the current rules do in fact technically allow for those interpretations (but that promoters/refs have a lot of latitude in when/if/how to enforce it), but reading between the lines it sounds to me like he is also essentially saying he hopes that the rule gets clarified at some point so that nobody even has the option to be able to choose to interpret it in those ways, and that until then he hopes that the promoters/refs don't choose to have stupid interpretations with stupid penalties for technical violations of the rule like those you mentioned that are clearly not unsportsmanlike conduct.
Click to expand...
In other words a really bad rule in the way it is written. I remember recently when a WPA referee called a foul on a woman player who pulled a ball out of the pocket after the game was over and the cue ball was no longer rolling. Terrible call!
 
I saw a ruling go sideways in a mixed Doubles Scotch event. The rule said with ball in hand your partner couldn't touch it. Well in placement was the intention. He touched the cueball while they were standing back from the table discussing the plan. Their astute oponent called "FOUL!" and was awarded ball in hand. 🤷‍♂️
 
gregcantrall said:
I saw a ruling go sideways in a mixed Doubles Scotch event. The rule said with ball in hand your partner couldn't touch it. Well in placement was the intention. He touched the cueball while they were standing back from the table discussing the plan. Their astute oponent called "FOUL!" and was awarded ball in hand. 🤷‍♂️
Click to expand...
That's an interesting situation for doubles play. Should both players be able to touch the ball? In some situations, the shooter for the shot has not been decided.
 
I think its only a foul to touch the object balls when any balls on the table are still in motion. The safe thing to do is simply walk away from the table without touching anything after the money ball falls.
 
Bob Jewett said:
That's true, but habits developed over your entire playing career are hard to break.
Click to expand...

I agree, and it’s especially galling that the habit being “punished” is one that arises from common courtesy. The current rule encourages players to be less courteous, not more, which is exactly backwards, IMO.
 
jay helfert said:
In other words a really bad rule in the way it is written. I remember recently when a WPA referee called a foul on a woman player who pulled a ball out of the pocket after the game was over and the cue ball was no longer rolling. Terrible call!
Click to expand...
I agree, it's a terrible call. Why not make the first one a warning? I'm sure news will travel fast in the tournament, and players will be aware not to intentionally break this rule, now that's it clarified.
 
ctyhntr said:
I agree, it's a terrible call. Why not make the first one a warning? I'm sure news will travel fast in the tournament, and players will be aware not to intentionally break this rule, now that's it clarified.
Click to expand...

It’s a terrible rule, I agree. But as Bob said, ingrained habits are hard to break. The players “know” the rule but they’ve been pulling balls out for as long as they have been playing pool.

It’s like the tournament in the Philippines where you had to expressly call the 10b even if it is straight in. Shane forgot and didn’t call it. I believe he unscrewed and forfeited in protest to the dumb rule.
 
GideonF said:
... It’s like the tournament in the Philippines where you had to expressly call the 10b even if it is straight in. Shane forgot and didn’t call it. I believe he unscrewed and forfeited in protest to the dumb rule.
Click to expand...
I believe it was also in protest of previous call failures that had not been punished.
 
The written, technical, words of a rule are one thing. The other thing is the strong portion of common sense which must be employed in interpreting and applying the rules. If it does not make sense, it should not be applied.
 
is there a rule that says players have to help the ref or the racker gather the balls?

www.facebook.com

11K views · 133 reactions | Is Predator/WPA getting dumber ? Bad enough this format is a joke for a World Championship 💩 Race to 4 💩Yes Touching the cueball while it’s still moving is a foul. This here should never be a foul. Rubilen Amit was obviou

Is Predator/WPA getting dumber ? Bad enough this format is a joke for a World Championship 💩 Race to 4 💩Yes Touching the cueball while it’s still moving is a foul. This here should never be a foul....
www.facebook.com www.facebook.com
 
Last edited:
markjames said:
is there a rule that says players have to help the ref or the racker gather the balls?
Click to expand...

I don’t believe so. So the “smart” play is to sit your ass down and let the ref walk around the table and get all the balls, which serves the refs/organizers right creating/enforcing a stupid rule.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top