6.5 year bump! Nick is now a 772 (down from 777), still with 706 games. He hasn't played a single fargorate game in 7 years. His rating must be super fragile now, and any new play will be highly weighted.
Nick Varner is a Fargorate 777
- Thread starter iusedtoberich
- Start date
No response from [mention]Mike Page [/mention] ? Inquiring minds want to know!
That's a ranking system. A rating system is very different from a ranking system.
And in effect, FargoRate uses the last three or four years of games played because old matches count less.
They sure aren’t counting less for Mr. Varner.
I’m sure someone will call this an edge case but it’s really not. 770 is bad data but it stays in the system, unflagged. Totally legitimate ratings with 150 games have a scary “preliminary” or “starter” tag but this obvious raspberry remains with no warning.
I identify as a Fargo 869.
I identify as a Fargo 869.
Just join the chat for any online stream. Everyone over 900 Fargo.
The only Fargo I know is the one in North Dakota, and where the the City know as Moorhead , MN is across the river from Fargo.
I don't know the answer. Some tournament he was in at some point in his career must have been removed from the system most likely. Today, for instance, we realized the 2025 SBE pro event was duplicated, and so we removed one instance. Those players will see a reduction in robustness and won't know why. Doesn't happen a lot but does happen. Nick has a lot of old games, and likely we judged some old tournament data was not sufficiently clean to keep.
Golf is not a network-constructed measuring instrument. It is literally counting strokes.
I don’t think those events go into Fargo - I don’t know why. Maybe Mike can explain because it would be useful data.
He probably still plays that speed on a bar box probably not so much on the nine footer.
I watched those matches, he played alright but not 770 speed and his hands are shaking that it’s amazing that he can actually pocket a ball.
I don’t think he can win a 650 and under tournament