Not publicly available, only available to members.Consider:
Owner 1 buys a cue and registers that ownership with ICCS.
Owner 1, or their heirs, sells the cue to Owner 2, but does not report transfer of ownership to ICCS.
Owner 2 tries to sell the cue to a pawn shop after a night of unusually bad rolls just before rent is due. Pawn shop owner checks ICCS database, and sees that the registered owner is Owner 1.
Should the pawn shop owner be required to contact Owner 1 (or their heirs), or should the pawn shop be allowed to, in absence of a police report documenting theft, buy and resell the cue?
In this example, there was no theft, but it could just as easily happen if someone stole a cue and tried to sell it a couple hundred miles down the road. Such databases have the inherent flaw that legitimate owners are not compelled to report changes in ownership. Unscrupulous owners could even sell their cue, then later report it stolen instead of sold.
Has ICCS addressed this weakness in the system?
More like AKC registry, without the inbreeding of cues...
I feel like you spend a lot of time on 4Chan or maybe the Epstein reddit