A nice writeup here from Thorsten but the line "several new business ventures have also demanded considerable time and energy" is not easy to get past. The slightest suggestion that he is too busy to play makes almost no sense in view of the very full array of tournaments in which he has played in 2026. In 2026, he competed in events on a very regular basis all over the globe, The idea that he's too busy to play in an event that a) covers his expenses, b) is held in the country in which he lives and c) ensures a payday of at least $20,000, does not add up.
I am as pro-Hohmann as one can be, and something here smells. If being well past one's playing prime and having had substandard tournament results in 2026 in WNT play (just two top ten finishes in WNT play) is a reason to disqualify oneself as unworthy of Mosconi inclusion, I guess we should expect the same of the 39-year-old Justin Bergman, who has shown nothing close to his form of ten years ago, has not contended in a single WNT event this year, and has not contended in a WNT event even once in his career. Of course, this won't happen and Bergman's selection seems absolutely assured now. I've always liked Justin and rooted for him, and I'll root as hard as anyone for him in Orlando. I hope he shines brightly when we get to Orlando ... but he is far less worthy of inclusion than Thorsten.
Maybe I am 100% wrong here, but I'll go out on a limb and suggest that Thorsten was either encouraged, pressured, or paid to disqualify himself from Mosconi consideration. This just doesn't feel right. If I'm wrong, I apologize to all concerned, but speculation based on an objective assessment of all the facts available is what this or any other pool forum is all about.