No safeties in nine ball

My least favorite move by a player is when they shoot a leave and they just have to bend over look 👁👁 and see if they hooked their opponent. An unprofessional move along with the jump cue. Just go sit in your seat.
This is especially annoying when there's a 30-second shot clock and the "rubbernecking" outgoing player is in the way of the incoming shooter, whose precious time is winding off of the clock!
 
There's no market for the games we play now, God forbid somebody try something different.

No ball in hand but incoming shooter can make them shoot again, maybe a 3 foul if the player doesn't make the ball
If the penalty for missing is not severe(BIH) missing can still be a more calculated risk. Not making a ball and giving Ball in Hand may be a defensive move as well. More that one cluster lets say. In the end the best shooter with more knowledge and cue ball control will win out. Obviously longer races.
 
This is especially annoying when there's a 30-second shot clock and the "rubbernecking" outgoing player is in the way of the incoming shooter, whose precious time is winding off of the clock!
Not if the clock operator knows what he is doing.
 
Imagine the amazing shots we would see, if there was no ducking?
Some of the safeties are amazing shots also. Two shot shoot out was the best game, but it takes too long for TV. The game they play now is a good compromise. I also liked the format where any time you didn't make a ball, the other player could make you keep shooting. That way the only person you could play safety on would be yourself.
 
Your problem is you don't get the basic 'reason" why pool is failing. And as such, you are wanting to try things that have absolutely nothing to do with WHY fewer people are playing/watching pool these days. I have commented before about how fruitless it is to attempt to fix a problem before you "know" what the exact problem is.

The short version is... Almost all competitive games require aggressive, competitive youngsters to replace the ranks of the aging competitors. These are mostly male, as males tend to start producing higher levels of testosterone at a certain age, which brings a numbers of behaviors to bear, one of those being competitiveness, and a desire to "gain territory". Just like all other mammal males. This basic mammalian drive is what produces competitors for ALL sports/games.

THEREFORE... See all games/sports as competing for young talent. Pre-1995 or so... Not much to do for young males, and commercial lease rates were still low enough to make opening a pool hall affordable. Pool could still pull young males at this time, because there just wasn't a whole lot else to do.

THEN.... Came the competitive video game revolution. The same basic skills are needed for pool and video games.. Muscle memory, hand-eye coordination.. AND, the young males can now just buy a PC or gaming console, and can practice 8 hours a day in the summer if they want.

So... Aspire to be a competitive gamer, and have no more than about $2K cost outlay + monthly fees if on console, and that's it.

OR, get into pool as a teen male. and struggle to find a pool hall that will let you in (not likely, as it is pretty much mandatory to have a liquor license these day to run a successful billiards establishment...), or shell out $8K plus, AND the cost of a house big enough to fit, a tournament quality 9 foot table.

So, there it is. Pool is not failing because random people are just hungering to see MOAR SHOTS, and if only we would show them MOAR SHOTS, then they would all of a sudden just love pool to death, and create another resurgence in the game.. Pool is failing because other competitive games/sports are cannibalizing our young talent, because pool has simply too many barriers to getting good, as compared to competitive video gaming, and becoming social media influencers, etc. The "Color of Money" resurgence in the game was a combination of a bit of a romantic idea of being a modern day "gunslinger", combined with low commercial lease rates, and bored teenage boys with nothing better to do. As soon as something more accessible came along to compete at, combined with rising lease rates, the death knell was sounded.

Note: This is a somewhat uniquely American problem, as many European/Asian countries have economies/population density that can still support many varied competitive hobbies/games/sports.

One of my irrational hopes is that with on-line retail displacing a good chunk of mini-mall space, that lease prices will drop some making pool halls a more profitable idea. However this also requires the building owners to work with potential pool hall owners to find terms that work. Right now it seems mini-mall owners are content with with having an empty building for years.,
 
No no no, if you don't make a legal ball on your shot, sit down Eddie Jones, opponent gets ball in hand .
Might be an interesting format for a local weekly 9-ball tournament and would drastically speed up the entire tournament, but would certainly not work for pro level events, unless possibly pockets were tightened up to like 3-3/4”. Then it might be interesting one time just to see how it plays out.
 
Your problem is you don't get the basic 'reason" why pool is failing. And as such, you are wanting to try things that have absolutely nothing to do with WHY fewer people are playing/watching pool these days. I have commented before about how fruitless it is to attempt to fix a problem before you "know" what the exact problem is.

The short version is... Almost all competitive games require aggressive, competitive youngsters to replace the ranks of the aging competitors. These are mostly male, as males tend to start producing higher levels of testosterone at a certain age, which brings a numbers of behaviors to bear, one of those being competitiveness, and a desire to "gain territory". Just like all other mammal males. This basic mammalian drive is what produces competitors for ALL sports/games.

THEREFORE... See all games/sports as competing for young talent. Pre-1995 or so... Not much to do for young males, and commercial lease rates were still low enough to make opening a pool hall affordable. Pool could still pull young males at this time, because there just wasn't a whole lot else to do.

THEN.... Came the competitive video game revolution. The same basic skills are needed for pool and video games.. Muscle memory, hand-eye coordination.. AND, the young males can now just buy a PC or gaming console, and can practice 8 hours a day in the summer if they want.

So... Aspire to be a competitive gamer, and have no more than about $2K cost outlay + monthly fees if on console, and that's it.

OR, get into pool as a teen male. and struggle to find a pool hall that will let you in (not likely, as it is pretty much mandatory to have a liquor license these day to run a successful billiards establishment...), or shell out $8K plus, AND the cost of a house big enough to fit, a tournament quality 9 foot table.

So, there it is. Pool is not failing because random people are just hungering to see MOAR SHOTS, and if only we would show them MOAR SHOTS, then they would all of a sudden just love pool to death, and create another resurgence in the game.. Pool is failing because other competitive games/sports are cannibalizing our young talent, because pool has simply too many barriers to getting good, as compared to competitive video gaming, and becoming social media influencers, etc. The "Color of Money" resurgence in the game was a combination of a bit of a romantic idea of being a modern day "gunslinger", combined with low commercial lease rates, and bored teenage boys with nothing better to do. As soon as something more accessible came along to compete at, combined with rising lease rates, the death knell was sounded.

Note: This is a somewhat uniquely American problem, as many European/Asian countries have economies/population density that can still support many varied competitive hobbies/games/sports.
 
With respect, I have to disagree with your analysis. My answer to the question, "Why is pool failing?" is that pool has always been failing. It has never "succeeded," i.e., become mainstream. Color of Money, etc., were simply temporary bumps in popularity IMO. Personally, I think pool can only reach a certain, low level of popularity for one reason above all others, having to do with the nature of the game. That is, it's a sport in which one has to achieve a fairly high level of competency to appreciate it, enjoy and become hooked on it. That's a high bar that many people reach, but not enough people, so it never becomes mainstream. And I wouldn't bring up golf in comparison, because hacker or ace, it's easier to become an enthusiast.
 
I sometimes wonder why so many people put so much weight towards "professional " pool players. An extremely small percentage of pool players is professional. Tournament play is more advanced but many also play on tables where they don't permit jumping because the owner doesn't want to get stung with new cloth costs. I realize it's common on higher skill levels but if you owned a public pool hall where any kid can rent a table, would you allow it? You can be sure the kid isn't paying for a new cloth should he slip up. The hall I grew up in and around never allowed it , with the exception of tournaments.. I remember he explained that he allowed it then, becuause they are more experienced...
Many watch hockey and those guys really slam each other, then I see kids checking like that in street hockey and in that case its' just basically an act of violence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sjm
I agree safeties are part of the game as is sinking a 9 by way of a combo. All tht is really important is that the players themselves agree on any modification to the rules, then its ok. Some who play in leagues or tournaments will want to to play by those rules as they want their practice to be as similar to "real" play as possible.
 
That would essentially turn the game of 9 ball into 7 ball. Did you ever notice how seldom (if ever) you see 7 ball played?
 
With respect, I have to disagree with your analysis. My answer to the question, "Why is pool failing?" is that pool has always been failing. It has never "succeeded," i.e., become mainstream. Color of Money, etc., were simply temporary bumps in popularity IMO. Personally, I think pool can only reach a certain, low level of popularity for one reason above all others, having to do with the nature of the game. That is, it's a sport in which one has to achieve a fairly high level of competency to appreciate it, enjoy and become hooked on it. That's a high bar that many people reach, but not enough people, so it never becomes mainstream. And I wouldn't bring up golf in comparison, because hacker or ace, it's easier to become an enthusiast.
 
That would essentially turn the game of 9 ball into 7 ball. Did you ever notice how seldom (if ever) you see 7 ball played?
I dont know the rules of 7 ball. Hooking is a big part of snooker and one of the reasons I love it. It becomes a bit like a game of chess with deeper thought and the intent changes as one on the loosing side "needs hooks" to win. Its a way to be mean to your friends but in a fun way :)

Now I may not be as familiar with 9 ball as some odf the ore serious players, and maybe if I play it more Ill be more in tune with the strategy of play, I just feel snooker creates even more of a situation where hooking is a big part of the action and strategy. It is part of the game in 9 ball and the thread was about 9 ball not snooker.
 
Last edited:
John makes some very good points as do others on this never ending subject. The fact is pool can't continue to rely on films like The Hustler and The Color of Money to give theses temporary bounces. The answer, if there Is an answer will inevitably fall to Matchroom or some other similar entity to help it along. Good luck to them,
 
One of my irrational hopes is that with on-line retail displacing a good chunk of mini-mall space, that lease prices will drop some making pool halls a more profitable idea. However this also requires the building owners to work with potential pool hall owners to find terms that work. Right now it seems mini-mall owners are content with with having an empty building for years.,
 
a lot may be area specific. if you are in an area of expensive real estate its getting harder to make a go of things. I imagine in New York or 90210 there arent; a lot of snooker tables or that playing would be expensive but in lets say Cleveland where all the civilized people ran away from downtown , maybe it can still be a bit more affordable to the average wage earner.

my take is that with the rate young people are staring at tiny phone screens they may not have the eyesight as they get a bit older. Bars suffered a lot with smoking bylaws and such, I personally won't go there to spend my money and be told where to stand. Same for concerts, They got so controlled I just won't go anymore myself.
At least with pool, its something you can play without being an athlete and a lot of elders continue to enjoy it longer into their elderly years than other more physically demanding sports.
 
I sometimes wonder why so many people put so much weight towards "professional " pool players. An extremely small percentage of pool players is professional. Tournament play is more advanced but many also play on tables where they don't permit jumping because the owner doesn't want to get stung with new cloth costs. I realize it's common on higher skill levels but if you owned a public pool hall where any kid can rent a table, would you allow it? You can be sure the kid isn't paying for a new cloth should he slip up. The hall I grew up in and around never allowed it , with the exception of tournaments.. I remember he explained that he allowed it then, becuause they are more experienced...
Many watch hockey and those guys really slam each other, then I see kids checking like that in street hockey and in that case its' just basically an act of violence.
You've asked a good question.

As I see it, the reason the focus is on the pros is that there is no real need for total standardization at the amateur level. Amateurs are the back bone of the pool world and they should play a game that they enjoy the most. I don't think the wear and tear caused by jump cues is terribly significant, but you make a good point. Each poolroom owner must decide for themselves. Masse's, near vertical strokes of the cueball, do cause great wear and tear on the equipment, and that's why they are not permitted in many pool playing venues. A strange, but important, dynamic in recent decades is that the increasing use of the jump stick has greatly reduced the need for use of the masse shot.

Pros, on the other hand, should play by a set of rules that caters to what the public will most enjoy watching. What the pros want and what viewers want is nearly never the same thing, but those who produce pro pool must manage the marketability of the pro pool product.
 
It would probably be a rare occurrence that a pro or very experienced player tears the cloth by trying to do a masse shot. An inexperienced player who is trying to do masse shots might slip up. I'm sure we have all seen the results.
I dont own a jump cue or know much about them. some of the more experienced players I play with do them. can the difference of a jump shot cue be explained? different tip? Im always afraid to try, maybe I will on my own table where any damage is my problem.
 
Back
Top