..............................
Please repost your picture. Just proves great minds think alike. And then there is us. We think alike too
Larry
I was amazed that your cue looked so much like mine, so I posted up a pic, then took it down because I didn't want to butt in with my pics in your thread But since you're good with it, I'll take a cleaner pic. That one was gritty.
On another note, I understand how tricky & frustrating it is to get the base of the points the same size, and stay the same size. The angle pitch on the back is much more severe than the front, so the depth change is not proportionate as you make cuts to final size. I had to make the back half of mine three times before I got it right.
I was amazed that your cue looked so much like mine, so I posted up a pic, then took it down because I didn't want to butt in with my pics in your thread But since you're good with it, I'll take a cleaner pic. That one was gritty.
On another note, I understand how tricky & frustrating it is to get the base of the points the same size, and stay the same size. The angle pitch on the back is much more severe than the front, so the depth change is not proportionate as you make cuts to final size. I had to make the back half of mine three times before I got it right.
This post is more about the style. Not the cue blank. That's why I enjoyed seeing your take on it.
Been wanting to do the 360ish thing for a while. With the points going the regular way the bridges looked clunky. Funny thing is, I hate reverse points, because they look short and clunky. After seeing one of TWs cues. This idea stuck in my brain as workable, but not clunky.
Larry
Thanks for looking!
Nice to see this thread again.
And nice to see you working on another cue in that style.
Thanks for showing off! :thumbup::thumbup::thumbup:
.