take it up with himNope
take it up with himNope
I agree that 100%Well, I read the comments, and, yes, it seemed like he was always talking about 7-footer vs. 9-footer. So I wonder whether he still feels that an 8-footer is easier than either of those (all other things equal) for 14.1.
I started playing pool when i was 14. I made my first 97 run on 8-foot table after few months. Maybe 10th time i played the game. I was still totally newbie and was only ok pocketing skills and could draw ball little. Took 15 years to beat it on 9-foot tables...I did a bar table vs a 9’. League cut 7’ Diamond and factory cut 9’ GC4. Equivalent cloth, balls, pockets. Recorded my runs for 60 some innings on each. The bar table was night and day easier. I’d bet the house if any player tried 20 or 30 innings on each, both their total and high run would be higher on the 7’. And I’d bet the house on every level player. From banger to Shaw.
Send me all the raw data and I could provide the probability. That's assuming the data follow some recognizable distribution.it's like saying "anyone who can get 40 years old can get 5 million years old"
(that's in ball ballpark of probability for normal mortals to run 150 in a year und needing 5 million years to run 1000)
(more accurate is probably: a player who can run 40 has a realistic chance to run 80 once if practicing a ton.
someone regularly running 150 has a good chance of running 300+ once (ballpark of life high runs of Mizerak and Sigel).
And someone regularly running 400 may get lucky once and run 700
Omg. I am quite jealous. On a 9ft I have run 50, and then 51, and then 51 again. I am stuck at this number.I started playing pool when i was 14. I made my first 97 run on 8-foot table after few months. Maybe 10th time i played the game. I was still totally newbie and was only ok pocketing skills and could draw ball little. Took 15 years to beat it on 9-foot tables...
thats quite hard to believe i must sayI started playing pool when i was 14. I made my first 97 run on 8-foot table after few months. Maybe 10th time i played the game. I was still totally newbie and was only ok pocketing skills and could draw ball little. Took 15 years to beat it on 9-foot tables...
I would love it if I could run 100 on my BEST day.Sure, John Schmidt had better days and worse days. He has his A game and C game sometimes (days when he hardly could put 100 togeter and days when he puts half a dozen 200+.
thats quite hard to believe i must say
You after Black Balled's money?(BB dollars)The financial incentive was there and both records were broken. Schmidt had it from Predator and made 626. Shaw had it from B.C. and made 714.
Me personally, if 1BB dollars were offered, and all the pros played non-stop straight pool for one year, I don't see 1000 happening.
Who cares his flip flopping. He ran 491. That's all that matters. That's as high as the sky.so hes kind of going back and forth the whole post
yeah i did this seemed hella easy
im not gonna try it but i probably could break the record if i did
but too old, not gonna try anymore just saying, hella easy
He only did that post because of Jayson obviouslyWho cares his flip flopping. He ran 491. That's all that matters. That's as high as the sky.
Coz there was no consistency...That's true.
Pocket size was never questioned. No one who played the game was concerned with pocket size.
Sheeeeeat!Game Of Millimeters
Five Inch Pockets
Hope he gets to 800 at least. Meanwhile there are Asians busy on Chinese tables...
You sound stupid.He only did that post because of Jayson obviously
Pretty stupid sounding on him
And if 491 was real he’d probably put it up
Can’t imagine why he’d not want to lol
no you doYou sound stupid.
thats quite hard to believe i must say