StraightPoolIU said:
Personally, I think Accu-Stat does a fantastic job and would be perfect for this tournament, but there must be things at work that I do not understand that make that an impossibility.
You may wish to chat directly with Pat Fleming about this, he answers the phone. I recall Grady Mathews mentioning that Pat's costs for covering an event have risen over the years, and must be more selective and turns down some requests for event coverage, or perhaps even asks for money up front to cover himself, a not totally unreasonable request given that it is "promotion" for the event.
It is not hard to guess at some of these costs. Lighting, 3 cameras, 3 camera people, editing director, perhaps a gofer, trailer plus gas to get all his equipment there, hotel rooms for several days, possibly airfare for his commentators, food, salary, probably insurance to cover himself should equipment be lost due to accident or theft, etc. These things could easily run up the bill to , uhm, near $10,000 for a weekend just to pull a number from my hat. Plus the costs of post production, media (tapes or DVD's) mailing catalogs, etc. would mean he may need to expect to sell perhaps at least 500 tapes quickly just to cover his costs, let alone profit which is necessary for his business to survive and keep on paying the mortgage and feeding his family. Randy just mentioned the market, despite our local fanatical interest, is very limited, I count maybe 40 regulars to the straight pool section of AZBilliards, the "best pool website on the planet". Not to mention the prospect of digital piracy of product killing future sales.
The real answer here may be, if Accu-stats has gotten too expensive, is there room for a competitor to get into the action and provide similar coverage and exposure, but at a lower price point? And, are you (Blackjack, others) the entrepreneur that is willing to start and run that business to challenge Pat's monopoly on the pool market?
One way to do it on the cheap would be to take up Randy's challenge, do the event your way, with this promise: we do it on spec, film, edit, etc. then show you the result, and if you don't like it we promise to can the result and it will never ever be released to the public so your "production values" will be upheld. But give us the chance to try first on the cheap. Nobody loses that way, but there is a chance for it to work out.