Folks:
I came across an interesting issue. While reviewing the 14.1 rules, I stumbled across the fact that two sanctioning committees, the BCA and the WPA, disagree on the placement of the balls in the opening rack:
Last I checked, wasn't the BCA some kind of foundational reference for the WPA rules, and aren't BCA rules/regulations/statistics/tournaments recognized by the WPA?
If so, why the obvious disagreement on the rack?
-Sean
P.S.: I like the BCA version, which is also the traditional version. The 1-ball and the 5-ball are the two brightest balls in the pack, and having them at the corners makes it easier for the breaker to aim at, as well as for the referee to watch these two balls to make sure they each touch a rail cushion (to comply with the "cue ball and two object balls must touch a rail" requirement). In fact, when I play One Pocket, I "borrowed" this concept from straight pool, and I place the 1-ball and the 5-ball in the second row of balls, with a dark ball as the head ball for contrast -- makes the opening One Pocket break a lot easier to be precise.
I came across an interesting issue. While reviewing the 14.1 rules, I stumbled across the fact that two sanctioning committees, the BCA and the WPA, disagree on the placement of the balls in the opening rack:
WPA rules:
http://wpa-pool.com/index.asp?content=rules_141
BCA rules:
http://www.bca-pool.com/play/tournaments/rules/rls_141.shtml
http://wpa-pool.com/index.asp?content=rules_141
4.2 The 14.1 Rack
For an opening break shot, the fifteen balls are racked in a triangle with the apex ball on the foot spot. When the balls are re-racked, the apex ball is omitted if only fourteen balls are being racked. The marked outline of the triangle will be used to determine whether an intended break ball is in the rack area.
For an opening break shot, the fifteen balls are racked in a triangle with the apex ball on the foot spot. When the balls are re-racked, the apex ball is omitted if only fourteen balls are being racked. The marked outline of the triangle will be used to determine whether an intended break ball is in the rack area.
BCA rules:
http://www.bca-pool.com/play/tournaments/rules/rls_141.shtml
6.4 THE RACK
Standard triangle rack with the apex ball on the foot spot, 1-ball on the racker’s right corner, 5-ball on left corner. Other balls are placed at random and must touch their neighbors.
Standard triangle rack with the apex ball on the foot spot, 1-ball on the racker’s right corner, 5-ball on left corner. Other balls are placed at random and must touch their neighbors.
Last I checked, wasn't the BCA some kind of foundational reference for the WPA rules, and aren't BCA rules/regulations/statistics/tournaments recognized by the WPA?
If so, why the obvious disagreement on the rack?
-Sean
P.S.: I like the BCA version, which is also the traditional version. The 1-ball and the 5-ball are the two brightest balls in the pack, and having them at the corners makes it easier for the breaker to aim at, as well as for the referee to watch these two balls to make sure they each touch a rail cushion (to comply with the "cue ball and two object balls must touch a rail" requirement). In fact, when I play One Pocket, I "borrowed" this concept from straight pool, and I place the 1-ball and the 5-ball in the second row of balls, with a dark ball as the head ball for contrast -- makes the opening One Pocket break a lot easier to be precise.