Can anybody tell me where to look for the results for the 1983 men's us open. I've checked the bca and can't find it. Top 3 finishers would be fine.
Thanks
Thanks
poolhall maven said:Can anybody tell me where to look for the results for the 1983 men's us open. I've checked the bca and can't find it. Top 3 finishers would be fine.
Thanks
are you positive, cuz we have a local guy here who says he was 2nd in 1983 when he was 16.jhendri2 said:1. Steve Mizerak
2. Jimmy Fusco
3.?????
Jim
poolhall maven said:I guess I'm looking for 9-ball #1, #2 and #3 for 1983. Does anyone know where I could look?
poolhall maven said:Can anybody tell me where to look for the results for the 1983 men's us open. I've checked the bca and can't find it. Top 3 finishers would be fine.
Thanks
poolhall maven said:Thanks so much for all your trouble JAM, that was a brain teaser. Oddly enough the 2nd place winner was not who I was told.
I'm not surprised at the top 4 places tho, we used to have professional tournaments at our room 3 times a year from 1980-1988 and the top 3 players were playing here--and winning.
Thanks again for your research.
Tracy
JAM said:What I found very interesting is how pool has progressed in the last 20-plus years. I have always thought that somebody had the brakes on with pool when it came to rising with the times, but when you read this article about the men's U.S. Open 9-Ball Championship, there was only an $11,500 total purse, compared to today's $250,000-plus total purse, but it is the field of players that is very revealing. There were 41 total competitors that year for the U.S. Open. Today, there are 250-plus competitors.
JAM
jhendri2 said:Not to change the subject, but wasn't it in the late 80's or early 90's when everyone was in awe that Sigel made over $100,000 in tour winnings?
JAM said:I actually enjoyed researching it. I have quite a library now of pool media, all in chronological order with little stickies hanging out of them, marking the pages for references.![]()
What I found very interesting is how pool has progressed in the last 20-plus years. I have always thought that somebody had the brakes on with pool when it came to rising with the times, but when you read this article about the men's U.S. Open 9-Ball Championship, there was only an $11,500 total purse, compared to today's $250,000-plus total purse, but it is the field of players that is very revealing. There were 41 total competitors that year for the U.S. Open. Today, there are 250-plus competitors.
With the advancement of pool in the States, though, ironically the American players are not as prominent as they were in days gone by because of the international competition, to include lucrative events. Though we still have many WONDERFUL pool happenings in the States, the player fields have grown with topnotch competition.
I wonder, as an example, if Mike Sigel was in his prime today, how he would have fared against the likes of Efren, Bustie, Thorsten, Alex, Ralf, et al, in 250-plus player fields as opposed to a 41-player field.
I still can't get over that nickname for Jay Helfert, "Pockets." LOL. I hope he sees this thread and replies.
JAM
jhendri2 said:Not to change the subject, but wasn't it in the late 80's or early 90's when everyone was in awe that Sigel made over $100,000 in tour winnings?
Jim
PoolBum said:I could be wrong, but I thought Nick Varner was the first to top the 100K mark with his incredible year in 1989.
jhendri2 said:You could very well be right. I could've sworn it was Sigel. It's been 18 years, heck if I remmeber.
JAM - Please help us out!