Show me what you got purd'-lady
klockdoc said:I might try this with low inside.
AZE said:Show me what you got purd'-lady
supergreenman said:What's the score? This effects how I'd play.
AZE said:The bank doesn't go, hence the point of the two balls.
AZE said:Show me what you got purd'-lady
...
Southpaw said:I would shoot into the right side of the 8 and hit the 8 into the left side of the 3 and get them both out of there and try and stop whitey.the 3 should go 2 or 3 rails and stop on your side of the table. JMO.
Southpaw
trendkill said:That's a bad shot, imo. In order for the 3 to go that far, you would need to hit firmly...and hitting the 8 on the side, you can't stop whitey in that area...so you're letting your rock loose. I wouldn't do this unless I'm just hitting balls around with a friend...even then I wouldn't shoot this. JMO.
Franky said:
senor said:Nice thought, but it's almost like conceding the 3 ball, I think almost everyone would shoot the kick into the 3 as the response, then move the 8 from your side after the 3 is pocketed.
If I'm understanding this correctly it's my shot and I have the bottom left pocket and I'm down 6 to 3. Then I would not select this option because it seems too complicated. I would not like leaving the cue ball in the area of where the three is because the three and the eight might set up for a return bank. This is a desperate measure. Being down 6 to 3 does not call for panic.Danny Kuykendal said:Two rail the eight, as was mentioned before, using mostly center-low, so the cue ball goes to the rail and kicks the three towards the pocket, hooking the opponent on the eight. I've seen Efren play this shot before. The main focus is on the cue ball, so the shooter doesn't get himself into trouble.
Danny