What's the difference between the USBTC 8 & 10 Ball and the US Open 8 & 10 Ball?
It's a travesty, no wait, it's a mockery, actually more of a shame... It's a TRAVESHAMOCKERY!!
What's the difference between the USBTC 8 & 10 Ball and the US Open 8 & 10 Ball?
What's the difference between the USBTC 8 & 10 Ball and the US Open 8 & 10 Ball?
[...]
What is the solution? Mandatory push out like CJ has been talking about?
I think 10 ball is better than 9 ball in terms of having the other player get a chance at the table. 10 ball is probably the most challenging type of game on a 7 footer. On a 9 footer, maybe move to 12 ball? I'm just throwing ideas out there.
Complain if you want, people, but don't complain to CSI. They're just trying to have the events while losing less money. Complain instead about the state of pool players and fans - about ourselves - who don't spend enough money on pool to make it viable to hold the kind of tournaments you'd like to see.
Thanks for the reply guys but it was kind of a rhetorical question, meaning I really don't see a difference besides the changing of the name, which is sad. It should be called The USBTC II. Just like Turning Stone has 2 events a year, you don't see them naming the second one The US Open Turning Stone. These 2 events are the same d@mn thing.
Yep...looks exactly the same to me. Using your logic, any 9ball tourny played on 9ft tables should be called Turning Stone X
View attachment 383861
There are not 6,000 people going to watch the 8 and 10 ball US Opens, that is just the league players that will be there for the USAPL and BCAPL tournaments.
Telling it like it is isn't complaining ,
You can believe thier loosing money if you like but I'm not buying one word of it
1
A few questions....
The ultimate world 10 ball championship organized by Badi Nahzat was on nine foot tables. So it has been proven to be able to be held on big tables. Yet, there was still no massive industry support (Bca, WPA) for the event (remember his open letter explaining why he cancelled the event).
Why would it be any different (in terms of success) with seven footers?
Why was Charlie Williams blasted by WPA for naming a ten ball tournament "world championship" with nine foot tables, but a WPA blessing is given for a tournament with seven foot tables?
Please show us how it can be done.
Please do the math.
128 players , 350$ entry, 10ball, races to 10
Enough 9 foot tables to finish in 3 days ( plus racks and balls)
At least 30k in payouts .
Your right it's never been done before ,, what the hell was I thinking
Do you actually believe Ozzy would put on a event that not only does not make money but loses money ,, ?
1
Every pool tournament is a money loser, and this thread is full of people in denial about that fact.
Every pool tournament is a money loser, and this thread is full of people in denial about that fact.
A few questions....
The ultimate world 10 ball championship organized by Badi Nahzat was on nine foot tables. So it has been proven to be able to be held on big tables. Yet, there was still no massive industry support (Bca, WPA) for the event (remember his open letter explaining why he cancelled the event).
Why would it be any different (in terms of success) with seven footers?
Why was Charlie Williams blasted by WPA for naming a ten ball tournament "world championship" with nine foot tables, but a WPA blessing is given for a tournament with seven foot tables?