The other night after a group outing for dinner a WPBA pro stopped in to hit some before heading home. I have a double shimmed brunswick in the basement. A group of us were hitting some balls and a B player ran into the following layout. The bank was not on (double kiss). Myself and the WPBA pro had differing opinions on what the correct way to play the end game.
Here are the two layouts and suggested shots:
Shot 1 much more aggressive.
Pros: Executing this shot will most likely give BIH. Miss the safety and you will sellout a long shot most likely off the rail.
Cons: Much harder to execute than shot #2.
Shot 2 much safer.
Pros: Much easier to execute never selling out.
Cons: The return shot gives the incoming player too many options like a bank, return safe behind the 9, snooker style safe back to the foot rail.
How would you play this?
Do you see another shot?
Does the shot selection depend on other factors? Like
How you are feeling/shooting?
Who you are playing?
The score at the time?
After a great discussion/debate we played it out to test our theories. Little end games like this to me are very interesting.
Here are the two layouts and suggested shots:
Shot 1 much more aggressive.
Pros: Executing this shot will most likely give BIH. Miss the safety and you will sellout a long shot most likely off the rail.
Cons: Much harder to execute than shot #2.
Shot 2 much safer.
Pros: Much easier to execute never selling out.
Cons: The return shot gives the incoming player too many options like a bank, return safe behind the 9, snooker style safe back to the foot rail.
How would you play this?
Do you see another shot?
Does the shot selection depend on other factors? Like
How you are feeling/shooting?
Who you are playing?
The score at the time?
After a great discussion/debate we played it out to test our theories. Little end games like this to me are very interesting.