A new rule?

Would you be in favor?

  • Yes

    Votes: 24 49.0%
  • No

    Votes: 25 51.0%

  • Total voters
    49

PGHteacher

John Fischer
Silver Member
Would you be in favor of a general rule of pool that stated very clearly that purposefully stopping a cue ball in motion by one of the players is a serious foul and penalized by something other than BIH? If yes should it be game specific? Like 15 balls in 14.1, loss of game in 8 & 9ball etc.. etc.. Or should it be just automatic loss of game in any game? Also this is my 1st poll so it may not be done very well.
 
The only reason I voted no is because if the cue ball was obviously not going to touch another ball or about to stop with no balls around and someone picks it up are you going to call a foul that will make them lose a game? That is petty in my opinion, however if there was the possibility of balls being affected I am not sure how that should be handled.
 
I don’t say there should be a limit to the length of the rule that would allow for such contingencies like somewhere in this rule saying “if there is a possibility that the CB will disturb, change or rearrange 1 or more OB’s” just as an example, I would be willing to entertain any and all ideas.
 
Yeah I think so.. People should know better. But there also can be some Honest mistakes. there is always 2 sides to a coin! :)
 
Would you be in favor of a general rule of pool that stated very clearly that purposefully stopping a cue ball in motion by one of the players is a serious foul and penalized by something other than BIH? ...
It's already explicitly unsportsmanlike conduct. Is that the sort of rule you meant?
 
Had to vote no..... Otherwise you are going to have players giving up ball in hand instead of attempting amazing kicks that have the chance of breaking up clusters if they miss..... To me snatching up whitey before it opens up my opponents cluster is the epitome of gamesmanship... Gotta love the look on their face..... Flip side is I likely make the same face when they do it to me =)
 
Yeah, no, Hell yeah, we need more f'ing rules:thumbup:


Like Custer needed more F'ing Indians:p

Whoinell dreams this sthuff up:rolleyes:
 
To me (and to the rules) that's the epitome of unsportsmanlike conduct.

pj
chgo

When in Rome.....

I took the high road for many years but the practice is pretty rampant... To the point that I have seen very few cueballs not picked up as soon as they miss hitting the lowest ball over the last few years....... It may simply be a regional thing.....

It may indeed be unsportsmanlike conduct but I can see the arguments being worse than the conduct if you whip out your pocket rulebook and try and make that call...

If the match has a referee they can make that call and I wouldn't even consider snatching it up....

If you are gambling or in a 5-10 dollar tournament good luck with trying to make that call yourself.... at least around here.....
 
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe that in 14.1 the referee already has the right to call a serious foul and assess a fifteen point penalty at his/her discretion. I happened in 2000 at the BCA US Open in NY, when referee Rolando Aravena assessed a 15 point foul on Efren Reyes in his match against Dallas West.

In rotation games, when balls are moved illegally, a referee is empowered to put the balls where he/she feels they would have finished provided the incoming player opts for such. An incoming referee should have the power to assess forfeiture of rack at his/her discretion after being advised of what happened.

In most matches, there is no referee and these situations are almost impossible to litigate. Good sportsmanship is the only real blanket solution.

I agree with the idea behind the proposed rule but don't feel the rule should be added to the rulebook as the only remedy for a situation when the infraction indicated occurs.
 
Try that playing for money, ya better be wearing a vest, and a helmet!

If you think a rule is what makes people do the right thing, I feel sorry for you.
As Renfro pointed out, some folks don't care about right and wrong, do you think a rule will convince them/him??
 
6.16 Unsportsmanlike Conduct
The normal penalty for unsportsmanlike conduct is the same as for a serious foul, but the referee may impose a penalty depending on his judgment of the conduct. Among other penalties possible are a warning; a standard-foul penalty, which will count as part of a three-foul sequence if applicable; a serious-foul penalty; loss of a rack, set or match; ejection from the competition possibly with forfeiture of all prizes, trophies and standings points.
Unsportsmanlike conduct is any intentional behavior that brings disrepute to the sport or which disrupts or changes the game to the extent that it cannot be played fairly. It includes
(a) distracting the opponent;
(b) changing the position of the balls in play other than by a shot;
(c) playing a shot by intentionally miscuing;
(d) continuing to play after a foul has been called or play has been suspended;
(e) practicing during a match;
(f) marking the table;
(g) delay of the game; and
(h) using equipment inappropriately.

Maybe you could try and stretch (b) to try and declare the foul but as written expect a fight over it.... You could argue the spirit of the rules where it states that the game cannot be played fairly but if both players are picking up whitey the field is even and fair..... I still will classify it as gamesmanship as the rules do not expressly address the act in question....
 
Renfo,
Are you a jailhouse lawyer? Or do you just not know right from wrong?

I agree that it is wrong.... So are most forms of sharking according to the rules.. see (a) in the above post..... All I am saying is that while it is wrong trying to call it on someone will likely not end well when you are interpreting the rules and there is nothing in black and white regarding the exact action.....
 
Object balls too, Intent, & Changing the outcome

Would you be in favor of a general rule of pool that stated very clearly that purposefully stopping a cue ball in motion by one of the players is a serious foul and penalized by something other than BIH? If yes should it be game specific? Like 15 balls in 14.1, loss of game in 8 & 9ball etc.. etc.. Or should it be just automatic loss of game in any game? Also this is my 1st poll so it may not be done very well.

If you had the power to modify the rules, then I'd say yes to your intention here, but i would go about it a little differently. This should be in reference to ANY ball, not just the cue ball, it should address intent, and it should address changing the outcome of the shot. It could be worded something like this...

A player who intentionally changes the path of ANY ball, and this action changes the outcome of the shot, the player loses the game. (edit: I'm just thinking in terms of 8/9/10 ball here.)

This way a person who picks up the cue ball early when it clearly was not going to touch anything is not penalized any worse than the original foul. And if a person accidentally moves an object ball while in the act of shooting, current rules already address this and my idea does not make the penalty more severe. But with my suggestion, if someone picks up the cue ball it is quite clear that it was intentional. It might be argued if it would have changed the outcome, but that would get argued anyway no doubt.

As has been implied by other posts in this thread, this will only work when playing people who go by the rules. That's a whole other kettle of fish.
 
Last edited:
Voted No....why...because the current rules should be enough to deal with it.
 
Thanks everyone

Very interesting poll results thanks to all. I definitely should have been clearer. What I really mean is that right now there is (as Renfro pointed out, not so much where he is from) an “unwritten rule” that you don’t pick up, stop with your stick, etc.. a CB that is in motion when you foul especially if it might/will bump another ball and or in some way change the makeup of the table.

My question is would you be in favor of writing this rule down in the rulebook in some way, that is absolutely irrefutable; spelling it out in no uncertain terms? I am a little surprised at some of the answers.

The OP was because I was reading a thread that said “is this unsportsmanlike conduct?” and it dealt with this directly. And most people said yes and that’s why I am a little surprised at the split answer.

So I remembered several times when I have been in a match people that have done this. In a couple of instances it was when he had fouled on the 8 and the CB was still in motion; and well I obviously got angry.

6.16 Unsportsmanlike Conduct
The normal penalty for unsportsmanlike conduct is the same as for a serious foul, but the referee may impose a penalty depending on his judgment of the conduct. Among other penalties possible are a warning; a standard-foul penalty, which will count as part of a three-foul sequence if applicable; a serious-foul penalty; loss of a rack, set or match; ejection from the competition possibly with forfeiture of all prizes, trophies and standings points.
Unsportsmanlike conduct is any intentional behavior that brings disrepute to the sport or which disrupts or changes the game to the extent that it cannot be played fairly. It includes
(a) distracting the opponent;
(b) changing the position of the balls in play other than by a shot;
(c) playing a shot by intentionally miscuing;
(d) continuing to play after a foul has been called or play has been suspended;
(e) practicing during a match;
(f) marking the table;
(g) delay of the game; and
(h) using equipment inappropriately.

Maybe you could try and stretch (b) to try and declare the foul but as written expect a fight over it.... You could argue the spirit of the rules where it states that the game cannot be played fairly but if both players are picking up whitey the field is even and fair..... I still will classify it as gamesmanship as the rules do not expressly address the act in question....

Thanks for posting this Renfro I really do appreciate your input to this thread it is always good to know how the other side sees it in order to make the best decisions for ALL concerned; and I really do mean that.

It looks like in unsportsmanlike conduct there is something there that can be “interpreted” according to this, I am saying 1 possibility is to put another little letter in there that states it clearly and would not be subject to interpretation; BUT that is only 1 possibility.

You should play in the APA if you dont already...

I like the APA it is just that I played in it and it is obviously not for me. But they are doing a lot to make people more interested in pool and for that I commend them; and I think for that they are a great boon for pool. It is just not for me I played in it for 2 seasons. I would not suggest this for the APA under any circumstances it is far too complicated for too many of them; until you have everybody agree that you should call your pocket just like everywhere else you go in the world (in competitive environments) a rule like this would be like asking an infant to run a 50yd dash before they were able to stand on 2 feet.

If you had the power to modify the rules, then I'd say yes to your intention here, but i would go about it a little differently. This should be in reference to ANY ball, not just the cue ball, it should address intent, and it should address changing the outcome of the shot….

….As has been implied by other posts in this thread, this will only work when playing people who go by the rules. That's a whole other kettle of fish.

I agree with you but some of the answers in this thread prove that that is far too complicated for lots of people. I know you said more than this and I am 100% in agreement with you but I think we would have to take it 1 step at a time till everybody could come to a basic philosophical agreement.


It's already explicitly unsportsmanlike conduct. Is that the sort of rule you meant?

Bob thanks can you show us/me where/how it states that irrefutably?


Try that playing for money, ya better be wearing a vest, and a helmet!

If you think a rule is what makes people do the right thing, I feel sorry for you.
As Renfro pointed out, some folks don't care about right and wrong, do you think a rule will convince them/him??

Excellent question! Feel sorry for me because I do; the rules are the only reason that will deter people from doing something. If a player does something and someone says “you cant do that” the person that did that is going to say “show me where it says I cant do that”; the law works the same way. That does not mean that in order to stop people from doing something that you can “just make it illegal; problem solved” no it means that if they do that illegal thing that they can now be penalized for it; where as before the rule, not be.

To me snatching up whitey before it opens up my opponents cluster is the epitome of gamesmanship...

Thank you for your honesty in how you actually play, I feel the exact opposite way.

When in Rome.....

I took the high road for many years but the practice is pretty rampant... To the point that I have seen very few cueballs not picked up as soon as they miss hitting the lowest ball over the last few years....... It may simply be a regional thing.....

I believe you, good point.

It may indeed be unsportsmanlike conduct but I can see the arguments being worse than the conduct if you whip out your pocket rulebook and try and make that call...

I believe you, good point.


If the match has a referee they can make that call and I wouldn't even consider snatching it up....

Exactly my point of this whole thread.

If you are gambling or in a 5-10 dollar tournament good luck with trying to make that call yourself.... at least around here.....


No offense but wherever your “around here” is it sounds like I wouldn’t really enjoy playing there.

Whoinell dreams this sthuff up

People that play straight-up against people that don’t.

I agree that it is wrong.... .....

Seems to be incompatible with.

To me snatching up whitey before it opens up my opponents cluster is the epitome of gamesmanship...

Can you explain?

All I am saying is that while it is wrong trying to call it on someone will likely not end well when you are interpreting the rules and there is nothing in black and white regarding the exact action.....

So if you think it is wrong, it will cause problems because trying to call it on someone because the rules regarding the exact action are vague why are you opposed to putting it in b&w? is it because?

To me snatching up whitey before it opens up my opponents cluster is the epitome of gamesmanship...

So you do this even though you know it’s wrong? Please correct me if I am wrong.
 
Back
Top