seb9 said:Really a lot of maturity on this thread.
(sarcasm)
You're a huge asset to this forum
(also sarcasm)
seb9 said:Really a lot of maturity on this thread.
(sarcasm)
dude I told you 200 and some odd post ago that any cuemaker can make you any kinda cue you want.....with what ever in it... guess you neede it said to you by 23 other people before it settled in....seb9 said:It's fine, i got all the information i needed out of the thread out of those who actually helped me with this subject.
Sorry to say smokeandapancak but you offered me no help but yet you are the one who's complaining that this thread is now off topic.
So much irony going on here.
seb9 said:Well i haven't seen you contribute anything in this thread bigskyjake except a few bad jokes here and there :0
smokeandapancak said:dude I told you 200 and some odd post ago that any cuemaker can make you any kinda cue you want.....with what ever in it... guess you neede it said to you by 23 other people before it settled in....
Mr. Wilson said:Seb, I asked you where you draw the line.
What parts of what dead creatures ( plants and animal ) fall under acceptable to you.....and why?
seb9 said:Don't you guys realize that they kill animals to make these cues....
They kill elephants to make your precious ivory cues... elephants are the most peaceful animals on this planet... they are herbivores and they don't harm other species... and yet humans kill them to make cues that could be made even more beautiful with out having to kill a utopia animal like an elephant.
Does no one care about this at all?
Poor elephants...
very sad.
Anyone knows good cues that aren't made with dead elephants? can you please suggest me a few if you don't mind? Thanks.
By the way, I'm not trying to insult anyone, i was just wondering if I'm the only one who cares?
Mr. Wilson said:Ok, but do you put as much effort into finding ( and ask for proof ) that no animal parts were used in other products? ( clothes, shoes etc. )
Why single out elephants and ivory, when if it is legal, it is pre embargo and these are dead long, long ( documented ) ago? None of the cues that ivory might be used in is contributing to the death of elephants right now in any measurable way, so I question the validity of your concern.
cigardave said:seb... just so you are clear, there are a lot of high-end cues that have real elephant ivory in them.
whitey2 said:Isn't it amazing how a little typo can change the whole meaning
of the post. (I'm assuming it was a typo, if not, never mind!)
pdcue said:How dare you want an implement that requires the murder
of a Maple tree. Have you no shame?
Dale
website said:Link
Do Plants And Vegetables Feel?
One of the more unusual questions received recently by the Department of Extension Horticulture from the public was, “Do plants and vegetables feel?”
Dr. Frank Dainello, Professor and Extension Vegetable Specialist, gave this reply:
“Your request for information on the subject ‘Do plants and vegetables feel?’ was forwarded to me for response.
Your topic is an interesting one and can be addressed from several points of view: religious, philosophical, or scientific. It can be confusing, especially when man attempts to equate plant and animal life in the same terms as human. For some reason, in today’s politically correct society, sane reasoning is in short supply. Although I have a Doctorate of Philosophy, I am not a philosopher, and since I am no religious scholar, I will attempt to address this topic scientifically.
As a recent infamous President of the US posed, the answer to the question is in the definition of the words of the request. It is doubtful that plants feel in the same manner as humans. It is true that they do not have a nervous system. However, they do respond to experienced stimuli. These responses are call tropisms.
For example, plants tend to grow toward or face a light source. Does this mean they are afraid of the dark? No, it is the result of auxin or growth-promoting chemical concentrating on the dark side of a plant which, in turn, causes this side to grow faster than the side exposed to the light.
Plants do respond to injury. When wounded, their respiration rate increases just as it does initially when humans are injured. However, the increase is due to an increase in the use of stored food reserves in an attempt to repair the damage or to grow new cells. If the injury is too severe, the physiological food-conversion responses are disrupted and death occurs. Often human respiration rates increase as a result of the mind’s influence on perceived consequences from an injury or a potential injury. Thus far, no one has been able to identify a single structure or organ in a plant that can be equated with the human brain, the organism responsible for human thought (some might suggest that certain cell structures are analogous to the brain in that they control cell responses, but that’s a real stretch).
Plants such as the tomato also have been known to abort their young! Although these abortions are often the result of stresses, they are physiological stresses and not emotional. For instance, fruit abortion is a defense mechanism of the plant to insure it will have sufficient water and nutrients to be able to mature a few fruit, rather than attempt to mature all of its fruits and cause none of them to make it. Developing fruit have a huge water demand. As a result of water shortages due to droughts, the plant growth is essentially shut down and fruit-drop occurs. All plant responses are a direct effect of chemical reactions!!
A tomato is still alive when removed from the vine. Evidence for this is its ability to develop color. If it were in a state of panic due the trauma of being removed from the vine and the fear of being eaten, I would suspect it would refuse or be unable to continue to mature. It would probably just shrivel up and die, at least that would be the human reaction.
In summary, I will utilize the Philosophy portion of my degree and offer some opinions.
Thus far, no one has been able to document a soul or a conscience of a tomato. Without these how can murder exist? If a plant were to have a soul or conscience, all animals in the wild would be vicious murderers, and deserve to be relegated to extinction in payment for their infringement on the rights of the defenseless weaker species (plants) they eat. Oops! They should be imprisoned for life since no being has no right to take the life of another. Or, perhaps man should be made to experience extinction because after all, plants and animals feel pain and suffering, and since man causes so much of it he should be removed from the planet. It can be easily accomplished, we just don’t eat anything living, or that was once alive!”