A shot you don't see very often, the kill shot

It's a must shot to have. I use it often on a BB when OB at one end of table and CB at other and next shot is next to the OB and I don't want to chance going around table because of too much traffic. It's just a stroke shot. Johnnyt
 
Imo one of the toughest and hardest shots in pool-especially under pressure. I would choose this way just if nothin else would work (not that often ^^). lg Ingo

efren likes that shot, i used that with cut shots close to the rail, hold the cb close to it, slow drag.

Yes, Efren seems to love that shot, especially here against Jimmy Rempe, playin' the ace at 0:33 in a hill-hill rack...

Listening to the crowd reactions and even the commentary gets me fired up...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8JM3FLwCrCk
 
Killshots are amazing if you can master them. Seems as if the angle changes but that could just be my mind. I too, learned it from watching Efren a few years ago when I started playing.
 
Not to hijack or change the subject totally here, but at 17:53 watch as Sigel uses the rake. Notice that he uses the rake as a righty, but plays lefty. I've never noticed that before.
dave


I have...

And the kill shot? I use it all the time because I play bad position...which is the reason you don't see it too often: the pros play good position:rolleyes:.
 
This shot comes up quite often playing 14.1 (straight pool ). Getting on the break ball. You will use it a lot when your key ball is close to a rail and you have to hold the CB and get a good angle to get back to the stack.
 
Also known as the "draw drag" shot. It's a foundational shot in 14.1. It's a great shot to use on crappy tables because you can hit it harder, yet limit roll after contact. Another great shot for crappy tables is stun follow ("walking").
 
I think that by saying that its good for crappy tables, people may get the idea that it is only good for use on a crappy table. Which would be missing the point of the shot. There is so much depth to this shot.
 
So am I correct that the shot will have a slower or stun effect after contact with the OB rather than just using a slow roll with center ball due to the low spin changing to follow close to contact with the OB?
 
PJ_draw_drag.jpg


From here:

http://billiards.colostate.edu/threads/draw.html
 
Not to hijack or change the subject totally here, but at 17:53 watch as Sigel uses the rake. Notice that he uses the rake as a righty, but plays lefty. I've never noticed that before.
dave

Good catch Dave. I wonder why he does it that way.
 
I always thought that shot was called drag draw and the kill shot was something else.

The kill shot as I learned it was when you have a shot where you have to cut a ball into a pocket and you want to hold the cueball down in the same area when the natural angle is such that it wants to go either one or two rails and go uptable. You hit the shot with inside/inside + draw and it starts to go the path of one or two rails out of the corner but instead the inside kills the speed dramatically off the first rail.
 
Venture off the vertical axis for more capability

A variation of the drag shot follows. Put low outside on this shot to not only kill the CB so you can stay "inside" the 8 ball to pot the 9, but the outside english helps throw the 7 in. This shot will swerve and must be compensated for.

CueTable Help

 
A variation of the drag shot follows. Put low outside on this shot to not only kill the CB so you can stay "inside" the 8 ball to pot the 9, but the outside english helps throw the 7 in. This shot will swerve and must be compensated for.

CueTable Help

If you're going to use any sidespin at all for the sole purpose of killing the cueball, this shot calls for inside english, no? (You may want to use outside to bring the cueball back a bit toward the 9-ball, however.)

Jim
 
If you're going to use any sidespin at all for the sole purpose of killing the cueball, this shot calls for inside english, no? (You may want to use outside to bring the cueball back a bit toward the 9-ball, however.)

Jim

No, because of the angle and the path the CB takes into the rail, inside will make the CB run. Plus to the extent you are cutting it a little thinner with inside the CB will retain a tad more energy. You will often see players use inside on this shot to go three rails for shape. Tough to do if it kills the CB.
 
Last edited:
No, because of the angle and the path the CB takes into the rail, inside will make the CB run.
From the diagram and the angle the CB takes into the cushion, it looks like the CB might have a bit of draw left on it as it collides with the OB. But it's a close call and I'm not sure if that was your intention? If the CB is allowed to develop follow (topspin), then I agree.

Plus to the extent you are cutting it a little thinner with inside the CB will retain a tad more energy.
This is the main point I wanted to make. The idea that you can reduce CB speed off the OB with outside english, by enabling a thicker hit and letting throw make up the rest of the cut angle, really isn't true to any significant extent unless the balls are fairly close to each other, and essentially no swerve takes place. This is because the CB is thrown in the opposite direction along the tangent line (equal and opposite to the OB's throw velocity component along the same tangent line - from Newton's third law). In other words, for the diagrammed shot, if the OB is thrown to the left (as seen from behind the 7-ball), the CB will pick up exactly the same component of velocity to the right (along the tangent line); its speed is increased by the ball-ball friction. If you're just reducing the OB's throw component with outside, then, accordingly, the CB won't be slowed as much by the friction.

Hitting thicker does yield a potential reduction in CB post-impact speed because of the slight shift in aim line direction. But this is a very slight change, roughly a tenth of a degree or two at typical CB-OB separations. It's so slight that just about any swerve along the way will generally cancel it, or more than cancel it, in effect producing a larger cut angle than meets the eye. Since this is a drag shot, as you indicated, swerve will occur. That's why I believe that swerving from right to left with inside, as opposed to left to right with outside, is the better option...as far as killing speed off the OB.

You will often see players use inside on this shot to go three rails for shape. Tough to do if it kills the CB.
As mentioned, I'm not sure what state of draw/stun/follow is indicated in the diagram. If draw, then inside would be called for. If stun, it doesn't make much difference whether inside or outside.

Just discussing. :)

Jim
 
Last edited:
Jim, I agree. It really does depend on the exact angle at which the CB hits the rail and as you say, if draw is used then it appears from the diagram that right english would make the CB run and inside would kill it. I probably should have qualified my post a little better. Really the point I was going for was that outside english, which has alternately been called natural or "running" english, in fact does not always make the CB run. Depending on the angle it can kill it too.
 
Jim, I agree. It really does depend on the exact angle at which the CB hits the rail and as you say, if draw is used then it appears from the diagram that right english would make the CB run and inside would kill it. I probably should have qualified my post a little better. Really the point I was going for was that outside english, which has alternately been called natural or "running" english, in fact does not always make the CB run. Depending on the angle it can kill it too.
We've been sort of focusing on two different aspects of killing the CB: off the cushion versus off the OB. Thanks for the clarification.

Jim
 
Back
Top