Ear-plugs should be allowed.
My post #47 was in response to Fenwick #45.
But you're quite right,the thread was on plugs,not hearing aids.
And i will run along.......have a nice day
Thank you!!!!
Ear-plugs should be allowed.
My post #47 was in response to Fenwick #45.
But you're quite right,the thread was on plugs,not hearing aids.
And i will run along.......have a nice day
In snooker there is a situation where the ref can instruct the player.
If the shooter is color-blind and is shooting a brown 4-ball thinking it
is a red,the ref must warn him.I think this is a good rule.
Therefore if a hearing-impaired player doesn't hear 'you're on 2 or
you got ball-in-hand or whatever' i feel he should get consideration.
30-some years ago i gave a deaf-and-dumb man a decent cue 'cause
he had a pretty good stroke.The game was frustrating for him because
hearing is a good part of learning.
Finally,after about 5 tries,he won a match.I went to the table and turned
him around so he could see 50 people applauding.His smile lit up the room.
Anybody who thinks hearing-impairment is an advantage should see
the movie 'The Heart is a Lonely Hunter'.
Steve said it perfectly.....ipods or earplugs or whatever....if I have to waive at someone to get their attention, I don't play them ever again....
Just wanted to point out that "deaf and dumb" is not a phrase that the deaf community like used. It comes across as condescending and degrading.
Wow, giving someone a headnod to say something while he takes a whole God awful 1.3 seconds to take a Ipod earbud out is such a monumental horrific experience for you that you will refuse to play again? I'm sorry and no offense here but that is just simply ridiculous..
My apologies.
I did mean 'dumb' in the classic sense of someone who does not speak.
What term is applicable for this?
I'm not being a wise guy,although i admit i used it in an earlier post in this manner.
I bet that we don't hear the arguments from the decision makers. I'M GUESSING THAT they will continue to set rules in place that they THINK are in the best interest of most of the players BUT AREN'T.
JoeyA
1. There isn't supposed to be much discussion going on when a match is underway.
2. In fact, the amount of speech that takes place in a match is extremely limited and that's the way it should be. ~ Joey A
I see nothing wrong with players wearing ear plugs to drown out the sound but if the OP is talking about earphones like an iPod or something GTFOH. How tacky and low class for someone to sport an mp3 player during a major event. I can't stand people doing it in the pool room let alone a major event.
MULLY
Come on man, can't you read, or are you really that lazy.
Post #16!
You know, the long and the short of it is this. Every single person in here, since the first day we picked up a cue, has played in noisy pool halls the majority of the time. Jukeboxes, weekend warriors screaming like they won world championships when they sh!t balls in, waiters and waitresses, people walking in front of your shot, people accidentally knocking into you etc... There isn't one person here that has experienced any of this things a billion times over. All of a sudden during a tournament you expect it to be quiet like a funeral procession. I don't get it. If all of your experiences in a noisy pool hall hasn't gotten you past all that then nothing will.
MULLY