I do believe Cliff Joyner is American Indian. (As is Leil Gay.)
VIProfessor said:I can state with unequivocal certainty that no person or group has the right to determine how other people define or call themselves or how they wish to be called, and you are certainly no exception. Although you obviously have no say in the matter, I am writing, in the interests of promoting a sense of community and mutual understanding, to clarify a few points regarding your post.
First, I believe that you be laboring under a misconception as to the provenance of the term "African-American". Whatever your feelings about Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton (and I will not discuss that here), you may be certain that the term neither originates with or owes its current use to either of these two gentlemen. You may go back over two centuries to gentlemen like Prince Hall, to the 19th century Martin Delany, and to numerous luminary figures and movements throughout the African-American sojourn on this continent. Identification with the ancestral homeland of African has always been a powerful current in social, cultural and intellectual development of "Black" America, and the largest organization of "Black" people ever built in the modern era was Marcus Garvey's UNIA, whose entire philosophy was rooted in identification with the African continent. As such, leave Al and Jesse out of this--this issue is bigger than any of them, or any of us.
To address your issue on its merits, I submit that your argument has no basis whatsoever, inasmuch as the term "African-American" explicitly affirms Americanness. I am willing to bet dollars to donuts that you can recall countless times that you have referred to people as Irish or Irish-American, or Asian or Asian-American; when in fact they may never have seen the land of their ancestral origin. The term African-American is no different. It simply denotes a particular population group within the American social and political fabric by its historical, cultural and ethnic background rather than on color or race.
In terms of the discourse among public intellectuals who often exert profound influence on public debate and usage, the term African-American, in fact, partly owes its current popularity to a paradigm which challenges the validity of a biological concept of "race". What does race mean as a biological concept in America, for example, when the vast majority of "blacks" have "white" ancestors and the majority of "whites" have "black" ancestors within the last 10 generations? (Yes, that is a fact! Look it up!) As such, terms such as African-American, European-American or Asian-American attepmt to denote various groups in our society on the basis of their group historical and cultural experience rather than on genotype, and it reaffirms that each group is, in fact, American. What is divisive about that? Does the sucess of democracy and equality depend on everyone being the same? Who would determine what that sameness should look like? Would you give up, for meager example, popcorn, the blues, pizza, barbecue, bagels and lox, and pilsner beer (all "American" favorites that are the product of particular ethnic groups) in pursuit of this sameness?
Rather than a melting pot, the better analogy for a multicultural America may be a pungent multi-ingredient stew or paella, in which each of the ingredients lend their own unique flavors to create a whole dish without being boiled down into a gelatinous indistiguishable mass. In the final analysis, ethnic divisiveness will not be resolved by eliminating and submlimating our differences, but by learning to accept and appreciate them. Good day to you sir!
Rudy Krigger, Jr.
A proud African-American
Frankenstroke said:I do believe Cliff Joyner is American Indian. (As is Leil Gay.)
I'm calling BS on this...you're playing the same whiny poor little victim card that Al Sharpton and the other whiny poor little mes use as an excuse for the brothers not getting out of the ghetto...the opportunity is there for all NOW and excuses for incompitence are not accepted anymore...MrLucky said:My personal thoughts on why there are not more Pros of color are very complex this has to do with society and economics in general ! At the risk of offending some here who view the world through rose colored glasses or what they tend to grasp from media reports even today in 2007 IMO the playing field is still not level ! Not pure racism like in Ciseros days but now the issues are cultural and economic! There are not the huge payouts in professional pool such as Golf for example where a Tiger Woods can in a relatively short time become a mega millionaire and rise above any impediments to his being successful in what was once a "solely wealthy white mans province" since to be able to play golf at all you most definitely need to be able to afford both the time and the expense! Most (not all in todays world but most) Black Pool players can not afford the travel and the fees, they do not have the bankroll or in some cases the backers that will allow them to live the life on the road of a Pool Pro ! They do not have the connections either! You can go to any major city and find the Cliff Joyners whom with some backing and or enough of their own money that they would not have the need to work to supplement their winnings while doing what they love and are good at, they would be ranked right up there at the top! I know of several players right here in Atlanta that can and will give many Pro's headaches on any given day but these guys are truck drivers, construction workers etcetera and play where and when they can.
__________________![]()
and perhaps its important to add for those that don't know ... Pool just doesn't payout all that much right now!
although this is off topic ..... You are displaying the ignorant / or just arrogant attitude of many racist!Craig Fales said:I'm calling BS on this...you're playing the same whiny poor little victim card that Al Sharpton and the other whiny poor little mes use as an excuse for the brothers not getting out of the ghetto...the opportunity is there for all NOW and excuses for incompitence are not accepted anymore...
What I clearly said was that many of the black / afro american players do not have the ability to leave their jobs and do this nor do they have the connections to the backers and and sponsorship that would allow them to support themselves and their families while persuing their dreams! I might ad that even today there is a much lower percentage of Blacks that have the inherited or passed down Family wealth that would also allow this freedom !Craig Fales said:My personal thoughts on why there are not more Pros of color are very complex this has to do with society and economics in general ! At the risk of offending some here who view the world through rose colored glasses or what they tend to grasp from media reports even today in 2007 IMO the playing field is still not level !
^^^ this is clearly saying that blacks aren't given equal chance at playing pool professionally because noone will sponsor them or back them...
Craig Fales said:I'm calling BS on this...you're playing the same whiny poor little victim card that Al Sharpton and the other whiny poor little mes use as an excuse for the brothers not getting out of the ghetto...the opportunity is there for all NOW and excuses for incompitence are not accepted anymore...
My theory is the perception that blacks see themselves as still oppressed in this day and age...this is what I'm talking about...the opportunity to make it playing pool is the same for blacks as it is for anybody else...what about all those Philipinos that battled their way to success at pool...did they come from wealth? I'd place a big bet that there are a ton of nonblacks that would love to afford to go on the road and play in tournaments...Craig Fales said:I'm calling BS on this...you're playing the same whiny poor little victim card that Al Sharpton and the other whiny poor little mes use as an excuse for the brothers not getting out of the ghetto...the opportunity is there for all NOW and excuses for incompitence are not accepted anymore...
VIProfessor said:To follow up quickly on my previous post and on the importance of pool culture and tradition in the development of young players, consider the fact that despite the fact that pool is now part of the information age, it is still extremely rare to see a champion or top player emerge without exposure to and association with top players. Like ESPN's "What's the link", you can look at the history of most top players and find mentorship and association links that lead straight back to a branch of the great American pool tradition. In my own little example, much of my earlier development came about under the tutelage of Bob Lisciotti, first cousin and early competitor to his World Champion cousin Larry. After returning to the Virgin Islands, a definite pool backwater, my game remained pretty much the same until being exposed to the larger pool world again and spending time with the likes of Spanish Pete (who was practice partner to Ginky, who learned much from George Mikulas (sp?), etc.). If we talk about REAL players, the sport is full of examples. Rodney Morris coming up under Hawaiian Brian, Johnny Archer traveling with Jay Swanson, Nick Varner coming up under Hubert Cokes, and so on. The point is that for most of the great black players, their immediate role models were not tournament players, but money players, and thus it is natural to expect that many would follow in that path.