10-ball's world-standardized rules already provide for limitation of "luck factor"
Sean,
I believe the biggest change is the frequency of the ten ball falling on the break. I've always hated nine ball because you can win on your first shot at the rack. Anything that reduces that frequency is OK with me. Also, the one added ball makes the routes between balls all the more difficult. Not fifteen ball rotation difficult but still harder.
Texas Express is the rule package of choice. Again its fine with me as long as they (the rules makers) don't change horses in the middle of the stream.
Lyn
Lyn:
I appreciate your very helpful insight and opinion. The aforementioned WPA rules for 10-ball already provide exclusion for "golden 10-ball breaks." (I.e. no 10-ball "on the snap" magic win; since the 10-ball wasn't called -- as *all balls* have to be called in 10-ball -- the 10-ball is spotted, and the player continues his/her turn at the table).
Quoted from
the rules: "
If the ten ball is pocketed on a legal break shot, it will be spotted and the player continues with his inning." So the "worry" about any "win from a single swing of the stick" luck factor was already obviated with the standard rules for 10-ball, from the get-go. No rule intervention needed.
I'm wondering if the perceived "need" for these Texas Express rules might stem from the industry's unfamiliarity with the well-established rules for 10-ball? Perhaps the industry "thinks" 10-ball is "just another version of 9-ball"? If this is true, this is really sad, because this is how well-established games get "bastardized" to either A.) fit a perceived "need" even though the established standard rules already address that need (read: unfamiliarity with the standard rules, so "we'll make up rules on the fly using what we know about 'games of this type'." Or, B.) for marketing factor -- "hey, it looks like 10-ball is really 'hot' right now, and we want to get on this bandwagon as well -- have our 'brand' siphon some of that luster that the now-'hot' game of 10-ball brings. It's a rotation game, right? So it 'must' follow the same rules of the rotation game we know -- 9-ball -- right?"
The unfortunate thing is that each tournament that does this, sets an example for the next tournament. ("Hey, Team DMIRO ran their 10-ball tournament with Texas Express rules, so we shall as well.") And the next one, and the next one, et al., until all 10-ball tournaments are merely 9-ball tournaments with just one extra added ball, and everyone "thinks" 10-ball is just 9-ball with one extra added ball. Same slop, same luck factor, except the triangular 10-ball rack is not as vulnerable to soft-breaking as 9-ball racks are. The original rules for 10-ball will have faded away into history, and "Texas Express" becomes the perceived "norm" for 10-ball.
Personally, I think 9-ballers are making a bigger deal about that "one extra ball on the table to make runs / navigation more difficult" than is really true. Especially on a 9-foot table. On the more-constrained real estate on a bar-box, that one extra ball definitely adds a complexity factor, but not on the expanse of a 9-footer. If there is an increased complexity / difficulty factor on a 9-footer, it's minor and perceived to be greater than it is. The *real* rules of 10-ball is what makes the game more difficult / less vulnerable to luck than 9-ball, not that one extra ball.
What you mention, "Texas Express is the rule package of choice," is actually sad. I'm sure you're correct, but the circumstance itself is sad. If that's true, what stops this from being applied to other games? It wouldn't be a far stretch to ask about Straight Pool or One Pocket. "Hey, we want to run a [ Straight Pool | One Pocket ] tournament, but we want to speed-up these games, so let's apply 'Texas Express' rules to these games." When does it end?
Anyway, these questions of mine are definitely rhetorical at this point, because DMIRO's rules are now "set" and cannot be changed. But I just wanted to point out the flaws / fallacies to the populace, because I personally don't want to see the great game of 10-ball be defaced with the Texas Express rules. I'm hoping the next major 10-ball tournament set up will use the world-standard rules as written, without "dumbing down" bastardization.
Apologies for the rant, but I sincerely hope this is helpful, for what it's worth,
-Sean