SpiderWebComm said:
His stoke is "pool simplified." Long strokes equate to more room for error, more things that can go wrong. That's why, in my opinion, he's one of the best money players ever. He just made fewer errors than the next guy for the cash (esp. their own cash). Just my humble opinion.
well said! Here's an article that somewhat explains a similar idea.
Baffling Economy Of Motion
Published: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 at 6:01 a.m.
Last Modified: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 at 7:21 a.m.
In her prime, Joan Benoit Samuelson, one of the best female distance runners, should have been faster than Alberto Salazar, one of the best male distance runners. Samuelson's running was beautifully smooth. Salazar's was not.
"He looked terrible,'' said Jack Daniels, an exercise physiologist at the Center for High Altitude Training at Northern Arizona University, who studied both runners in the 1980s. "She looked great.''
Not only that but Samuelson also had an amazing ability to use oxygen to fuel her body, Daniels said. Even though women's maximum oxygen consumption, or VO2 max, is typically lower than that of men, hers was as high as Salazar's. Maximum oxygen consumption was often considered one of the best predictors of performance in distance events.
But Salazar always ran faster than Samuelson. The difference between them turned out to be one of the least understood and most mythologized aspects of performance: economy of motion. It's the relationship between how much energy you expend and how fast you go.
"How much is it costing you to run 10 miles an hour?'' Daniels asked. "If it costs you less than it costs someone else, you are more economical.''
Salazar, despite his less than classic running style, expended less energy when he ran. So when he and Samuelson put out the same effort, he ran faster.
But economy is baffling. It seems to be physiological, but it is not clear what exactly is involved. Is it an ability of muscles to use energy, an ability to use a variety of muscles in concert, an ability of nerves to activate certain muscles for a task while allowing other muscles to relax, an ability of nerves to fire in near-perfect patterns? Or is it all of these things in combination?
After that it goes into more running styles, but I think it explains the beauty of an economical stroke and the lack of wasted energy.
Also, on the subject of moving up and down. I do the same thing, and what I'm trying to do is see/find the angle of the shot. By moving my head up and down I can feel the angle needed....farther the shot the lower I get. I'm sure Allen is doing the same thing.
There is absolutely something to be said for removing wasted energy from your game IMO.