The case is iron-clad in women's nine ball. The WPBA top 12 consists of seven Europeans, three Americans and two Asians. Obviously, America isn't on top in women's pool right now, though some of the young American talent might change that soon.
But what about the men? A wise man on this forum named Colin Colenso has written that "the USA had really better start thinking about sending a better team as their performance is disastrous for the original home of the game." Colin couldn't be more correct. We sent a few players that had virtually no chance to get through the round robin stages of the event, while every single one of the following twelve non-participants would have had excellent chances to reach the elimination stages:
Tony Robles, Jarrod Clowery, Danny Hewitt, John Schmidt, Tony Chohan, Larry Nevel, Gabe Owen,Frankie Hernandez, Shannon Daulton, Rob Saez,
Mike Zuglan, Shawn Putnam
... and I'm sure there are others that I've forgotten. I know some of these players were invited and couldn't make it for one reason or another, but the fact remains that none of these magnificent players went to Taiwan.
Barring a cracking good effort from this point of the WPC on, the world will likely conclude that the level of nine ball in the USA has declined, and it will be tough to blame the world for doing so.
When 22 of 25 players from the Philippines or Chinese Taipei make it through the round robin stage and only 7 of 13 Americans, and when Americans lost more racks than they won in the round robin stages, it would be very easy for anybody to conclude that Asia has left America in the dust.
Of course, we all know this isn't so. Or is it?
What, my felllow posters, does the 2004 WPC tell us about the state of American men's nine ball? Also, what can we do to ensure greater participation of our top men in the World Pool Championships?
But what about the men? A wise man on this forum named Colin Colenso has written that "the USA had really better start thinking about sending a better team as their performance is disastrous for the original home of the game." Colin couldn't be more correct. We sent a few players that had virtually no chance to get through the round robin stages of the event, while every single one of the following twelve non-participants would have had excellent chances to reach the elimination stages:
Tony Robles, Jarrod Clowery, Danny Hewitt, John Schmidt, Tony Chohan, Larry Nevel, Gabe Owen,Frankie Hernandez, Shannon Daulton, Rob Saez,
Mike Zuglan, Shawn Putnam
... and I'm sure there are others that I've forgotten. I know some of these players were invited and couldn't make it for one reason or another, but the fact remains that none of these magnificent players went to Taiwan.
Barring a cracking good effort from this point of the WPC on, the world will likely conclude that the level of nine ball in the USA has declined, and it will be tough to blame the world for doing so.
When 22 of 25 players from the Philippines or Chinese Taipei make it through the round robin stage and only 7 of 13 Americans, and when Americans lost more racks than they won in the round robin stages, it would be very easy for anybody to conclude that Asia has left America in the dust.
Of course, we all know this isn't so. Or is it?
What, my felllow posters, does the 2004 WPC tell us about the state of American men's nine ball? Also, what can we do to ensure greater participation of our top men in the World Pool Championships?