An American disgrace

Well, I just got done watching a bunch of the MC cup matches. I have not read all of the responses here, save the last page here I am typing to add to the thread.

Here is what I got out of it from taking a step back and using some hindsight.......

!- TEAM USA was woefully unprepared. They weren't shooting their best, they weren't ready mentally , and to TEAM EUROPE's credit they were the EXACT opposite. I was not surprised to see this as they had a permanent non-playing coach who was supportive at every turn. Quite frankly, I seen JA giving ra-ra ,and fundamental observations. TEAM usa was a collection of 5 individuals, not a TEAM. (TEAMS have cohesion: they work , live ,eat ,sleep,and face the heat of battle TOGETHER.) <---- Hell, I seen TEAM EUROPE team-mates giving each other shoulder rubs to loosen them up when they thought a player was getting tight in their chair.

2- TEAM USA's over-enthusiasm when there was some hint of positive momentum was a clear "tell" that they were tight, and things were amiss. Keep it quiet - whisper.

3- The lively oration of TEAM USA's players was unprofessional. In hindsight, the swearing and talking to ones-self may have been a result of their frustration. I like Earl, BUT HIS BEHAVIOR WAS OVER THE TOP ! He had no business talking while his opp was shooting. He has no business telling the world how "lucky" a shot his opp made. Earl was playing well though, gotta give him that much, Even when he was B****'in, he made it look easy.

4- TEAM EUROPE was quiet and professional, for the most part, and when they got loud , it was mostly b/c of Earl. :frown:

5 - I honestly don't think Earl should EVER be allowed to play MC again. :angry: he's NOT a TEAM player.

That's my critique: now to offer a few (possible) solutions.

1- I wouldn't make an entire team of PRO players from the gambling ranks. (nothing personal here). Gambling and tournament play requires a different mindset. You don't "get it back later," as with gambling in tournament play. One chance: That's it ! IF you get more than 1, it is because your opp messed up. Seldom happens in tourney play.

2- Pull Tournament players that are short-stop speed and put them in to play. They will handle the pressure just as good as gamblers given the experience factor. They will also fair better from a tactical standpoint. (I think this is why Hatch does well in MC). Would be nice to see Tretault, or Casanzio or peops of that caliber taking a shot which is exactly what the Europeans are currently doing.

3- A sole independent coach, that has the time to coach with the players gathering at set times around the year to practice and bond. This would establish that team cohesion. The current "yahtzee" approach of having an idea who will play in summer, then picking at Haloween is frought with failure.

4- TEAM EUROPE had a plan, and executed that plan to near perfection. KUDOS to them for doing so !! :thumbup:

I have learned a lot from crushing defeat so that it (hopefully) can never happen again.
TEAM USA needs to learn from MC cup 2013,in order to improve and win in the future.

very good post. from someone unbiased. and "spot-on"! interesting....

PL <---- biased.
 
...
1- I wouldn't make an entire team of PRO players from the gambling ranks. (nothing personal here). Gambling and tournament play requires a different mindset. You don't "get it back later," as with gambling in tournament play. One chance: That's it ! IF you get more than 1, it is because your opp messed up. Seldom happens in tourney play.

2- Pull Tournament players that are short-stop speed and put them in to play. They will handle the pressure just as good as gamblers given the experience factor. They will also fair better from a tactical standpoint. (I think this is why Hatch does well in MC). Would be nice to see Tretault, or Casanzio or peops of that caliber taking a shot which is exactly what the Europeans are currently doing.

...

I'm not sure that these two points make sense, because this year's USA team members are all extremely experienced in tournament play; they weren't just drawn from "the gambling ranks." Most of them may have done a lot of gambling in their early years in pool, but they all have demonstrated many times that they also have the mindset needed for success in tournaments. Nor do I see how shortstops would play better from a tactical standpoint. And are you saying Europe is using shortstops in the Mosconi Cup? I think not.
 
The real problem to me is that Team America needs to build toward something. In the end, though they meant well, I think Matchroom hurt America's chances by having the 2013 team chosen on something other than merit.

Team USA consisted of three players that are past their prime (Archer, Strickland, Morris) and one who has had two bad years in a row in competition (Hatch). Personally, I'm tired of praying that these guys can turn back the clock and find their form of days gone by.

The only positive is that the thirty year old Van Boening played fine and is now a year wiser as far as this event is concerned. Shane will likely be on at least nine of the next ten Team USA squads. ... but Team USA needs an infusion of youth, and, to be honest, I hope young guys who shoot straight like Justin Hall, Jeremy Sossei, Brandon Shuff, Jesse Engel, Billy Thorpe, Mike Dechaine, Hunter Lombardo, Tommy D'Alfonso, Dan Mastermaker and Skylar Woodward start to replace old timers whose days have passed. Once some of these guys play and get used to the pressure of the Mosconi, it will pave the way for the future success of Team USA.

America needs to build for the future if it hopes to be competitive anytime soon. I'll be rooting hard in 2014 for the youth movement, so America can start building for the future.

Nonetheless, if the criteria for making the team are stated explicitly and one or more old timer(s) play well enough to earn a spot, they belong on the team.
 
Last edited:
Being Canadian and thus having no dog in this fight I would add that USA did not get the rolls. If you look at whole thing and count them off the table seemed to be rolling one way.

Did the Europe team play better...absolutely (it's always easier when positive things keep happening)

The Break was a fickle beast. Quite often when Europe didn't make a ball the USA had nothing. Go watch the whole thing. The ratio was off the chart. Europe was left with a lot of Cosmo racks after the break. it was freaky. Almost ball in hand shape.

When the Americans fluked a ball they had nothing positive to work from. Europe on the other hand almost always on the next ball.

In the end the balls know who is playing better. It's almost magic.

Well, I just got done watching a bunch of the MC cup matches. I have not read all of the responses here, save the last page here I am typing to add to the thread.

Here is what I got out of it from taking a step back and using some hindsight.......

!- TEAM USA was woefully unprepared. They weren't shooting their best, they weren't ready mentally , and to TEAM EUROPE's credit they were the EXACT opposite. I was not surprised to see this as they had a permanent non-playing coach who was supportive at every turn. Quite frankly, I seen JA giving ra-ra ,and fundamental observations. TEAM usa was a collection of 5 individuals, not a TEAM. (TEAMS have cohesion: they work , live ,eat ,sleep,and face the heat of battle TOGETHER.) <---- Hell, I seen TEAM EUROPE team-mates giving each other shoulder rubs to loosen them up when they thought a player was getting tight in their chair.

2- TEAM USA's over-enthusiasm when there was some hint of positive momentum was a clear "tell" that they were tight, and things were amiss. Keep it quiet - whisper.

3- The lively oration of TEAM USA's players was unprofessional. In hindsight, the swearing and talking to ones-self may have been a result of their frustration. I like Earl, BUT HIS BEHAVIOR WAS OVER THE TOP ! He had no business talking while his opp was shooting. He has no business telling the world how "lucky" a shot his opp made. Earl was playing well though, gotta give him that much, Even when he was B****'in, he made it look easy.

4- TEAM EUROPE was quiet and professional, for the most part, and when they got loud , it was mostly b/c of Earl. :frown:

5 - I honestly don't think Earl should EVER be allowed to play MC again. :angry: he's NOT a TEAM player.

That's my critique: now to offer a few (possible) solutions.

1- I wouldn't make an entire team of PRO players from the gambling ranks. (nothing personal here). Gambling and tournament play requires a different mindset. You don't "get it back later," as with gambling in tournament play. One chance: That's it ! IF you get more than 1, it is because your opp messed up. Seldom happens in tourney play.

2- Pull Tournament players that are short-stop speed and put them in to play. They will handle the pressure just as good as gamblers given the experience factor. They will also fair better from a tactical standpoint. (I think this is why Hatch does well in MC). Would be nice to see Tretault, or Casanzio or peops of that caliber taking a shot which is exactly what the Europeans are currently doing.

3- A sole independent coach, that has the time to coach with the players gathering at set times around the year to practice and bond. This would establish that team cohesion. The current "yahtzee" approach of having an idea who will play in summer, then picking at Haloween is frought with failure.

4- TEAM EUROPE had a plan, and executed that plan to near perfection. KUDOS to them for doing so !! :thumbup:

I have learned a lot from crushing defeat so that it (hopefully) can never happen again.
TEAM USA needs to learn from MC cup 2013,in order to improve and win in the future.
 
reply to orig post

I'm not sure that these two points make sense, because this year's USA team members are all extremely experienced in tournament play; they weren't just drawn from "the gambling ranks." Most of them may have done a lot of gambling in their early years in pool, but they all have demonstrated many times that they also have the mindset needed for success in tournaments. Nor do I see how shortstops would play better from a tactical standpoint. And are you saying Europe is using shortstops in the Mosconi Cup? I think not.
You are right I did not state my point clearly. (most understood what I was trying to say.)
PRO's winning tourneys are different than short-stops or A+ winning. The latter bunch know how to grind, aka use tactical advantage.


sjm;4486388[B said:
]The real problem to me is that Team America needs to build toward something.[/B] In the end, though they meant well, I think Matchroom hurt America's chances by having the 2013 team chosen on something other than merit.

Team USA consisted of three players that are past their prime (Archer, Strickland, Morris) and one who has had two bad years in a row in competition (Hatch). Personally, I'm tired of praying that these guys can turn back the clock and find their form of days gone by.Past prime PRO's should be coaching, not playing. (IMO)

The only positive is that the thirty year old Van Boening played fine and is now a year wiser as far as this event is concerned. Shane will likely be on at least nine of the next ten Team USA squads. ... but Team USA needs an infusion of youth, and, to be honest, I hope young guys who shoot straight like Brandon Shuff, Jesse Engel, Billy Thorpe, Mike Dechaine, Hunter Lombardo, Tommy D'Alfonso, Dan Mastermaker and Skylar Woodward start to replace old timers whose days have passed. Once some of these guys play and get used to the pressure of the Mosconi, it will pave the way for the future success of Team USA. You say here what I meant in my post better than I did :thumbup:

America needs to build for the future if it hopes to be competitive anytime soon. I'll be rooting hard in 2014 for the youth movement, so America can start building for the future.Me thinks they are 3 yrs behind currently and I agree w/you 100%

Nonetheless, if the criteria for making the team are stated explicitly and one or more old timer(s) play well enough to earn a spot, they belong on the team.

Being Canadian and thus having no dog in this fight I would add that USA did not get the rolls. If you look at whole thing and count them off the table seemed to be rolling one way.

Did the Europe team play better...absolutely (it's always easier when positive things keep happening)

The Break was a fickle beast. Quite often when Europe didn't make a ball the USA had nothing. Go watch the whole thing. The ratio was off the chart. Europe was left with a lot of Cosmo racks after the break. it was freaky. Almost ball in hand shape.

When the Americans fluked a ball they had nothing positive to work from. Europe on the other hand almost always on the next ball.

In the end the balls know who is playing better. It's almost magic.

Granted, I noticed the European team was getting the benefit of the rolls. Thing is: The matches weren't even close to consider the weight rolls played in most matches. TEAM USA was out classed! <----- hated to admit that ! :o
Concerning the break,... that table was wikkkkkked !!! :eek:
 
You are right I did not state my point clearly. (most understood what I was trying to say.)
PRO's winning tourneys are different than short-stops or A+ winning. The latter bunch know how to grind, aka use tactical advantage.






Granted, I noticed the European team was getting the benefit of the rolls. Thing is: The matches weren't even close to consider the weight rolls played in most matches. TEAM USA was out classed! <----- hated to admit that ! :o
Concerning the break,... that table was wikkkkkked !!! :eek:

Those are some good observations. I'm not sure I would say the Team USA was "out-classed"; rather, I'd say they were NOT PREPARED.

For a team event like the Mosconi Cup, the players need to bond as a team, and this did not happen with Team USA. As I have stated previously, the Americans seemed to look at this year's Mosconi Cup as a social event on their social calendar. Win or lose, they get paid.

The Europeans came to win. They bonded together, had good direction from their team captain, and came prepared to do exactly what they did.

For the folks saying that Mika, Darren, Niels, Ralf, and Karl can kick any American's put on a field of tournament blue, I say hogwash. Every single one of them has lost to an American. The difference between the Mosconi Cup and other competitions is that Team Europe, to their credit, had one goal in mind this year in Vegas: WIN! Team USA didn't have as stong a will to win because, if they had, they would have practiced together and been a team unit. This didn't happen, unfortunately.

Congraulations are in order fro Team Europe for an excellent display of team unison in the biggest pool competition of them all. Bravo! :)

After this year's extravaganza, I hope whoever is chosen the next time to represent America that they learn from this year's fumble. :wink:
 
Those are some good observations. I'm not sure I would say the Team USA was "out-classed"; rather, I'd say they were NOT PREPARED.

For a team event like the Mosconi Cup, the players need to bond as a team, and this did not happen with Team USA. As I have stated previously, the Americans seemed to look at this year's Mosconi Cup as a social event on their social calendar. Win or lose, they get paid.

The Europeans came to win. They bonded together, had good direction from their team captain, and came prepared to do exactly what they did.

For the folks saying that Mika, Darren, Niels, Ralf, and Karl can kick any American's put on a field of tournament blue, I say hogwash. Every single one of them has lost to an American. The difference between the Mosconi Cup and other competitions is that Team Europe, to their credit, had one goal in mind this year in Vegas: WIN! Team USA didn't have as stong a will to win because, if they had, they would have practiced together and been a team unit. This didn't happen, unfortunately.

Congraulations are in order fro Team Europe for an excellent display of team unison in the biggest pool competition of them all. Bravo! :)

After this year's extravaganza, I hope whoever is chosen the next time to represent America that they learn from this year's fumble. :wink:

Man for man, Europe is FAR stronger. All else is mere delusion.
 

Attachments

  • StatueOfFreedom.jpg
    StatueOfFreedom.jpg
    24 KB · Views: 198
Back
Top