Another 9 ball racking solution

Kid Dynomite

Dennis (Michael) Wilson
Silver Member
Anyone try this?

78818a8d6859b2c1dd50f16c14a6324d.jpg
f1ead6c1f5dbb01444a0b781f79a7340.jpg
ed88e6482ebadb4e5ba68cbd4307953e.jpg


It may be a Better solution.

Kd
 
I have wondered how that would work

I have wondered how that would work. My bet is that when the pro field started trying to dope out that rack some would find a way to make a ball consistently in short order. It would be worth a try though.

I think ultimately texas express nine ball needs to go away or more balls be added. All the rules trying to patch up a game that was originally designed to speed up a version of nine ball that worked just fine seems silly.

Hu
 
Have you hit some with this config? Looks like the 2&3 would be heading to the side pockets with a break from the middle of the table. Much like 10 ball.
 
I haven't tried it, but that's a 7-ball rack with two balls added. As I recall, there were dead balls from a 7-ball rack. Maybe the back two "side" balls (6 & 7) are dead. Or can be made dead.
 
Rack them how you like, Shane would be the best breaker, and someone would call him out for it.

I like having the one in the back of the rack and the breaker must kick at it.
 
I think the two best ways to patch the break at nine ball are "breaker shoots" and "shooter after the break must push". Which is best depends on how fast you want the game to be and how much back-and-forth is interesting to you.
 
Rack them how you like, Shane would be the best breaker, and someone would call him out for it.

I like having the one in the back of the rack and the breaker must kick at it.

:thumbup: That's how Efren has been warming up at the Hangelar Open last year!

He has set up a 9-ball rack, kicked at it 2 rails, made the corner ball...
... and ran out pocketing ALL balls in the lower right corner!

Seems, he's figured that one out already... :p
 
Back
Top