Anyone know what this rack would be for?

Eric M.

Active member
Diamond like a 9 ball rack but larger. That's a 9 ball rack inside of it. It holds 16 - 2 1/4" balls kind of, not tight.
I got this from an estate as part of a 1910 Brunswick Wellington table so may be from that era.

Thanks
 

Attachments

  • Diamond rack.jpg
    Diamond rack.jpg
    212.4 KB · Views: 25
Could be it holds 9- 2 1/2" balls but that is just a wild guess. I know carom balls are larger than the standard 2 1/4" balls of today. I bet Rubix Cube has a more definittive answer.
 
Could be it holds 9- 2 1/2" balls but that is just a wild guess. I know carom balls are larger than the standard 2 1/4" balls of today. I bet Rubix Cube has a more definittive answer.
I was thinking the same thing. The table did come with 1 white 2 1/2" ball. But what game is played with that many carom (or 2 1/2") balls using a diamond rack?
 
It's probably for a 16-ball game. Those would rack in a larger triangle. I think poker pool uses 16 balls.
 
Not really a very good fit of 16 - 2 1/4" balls. I had to push from the top and bottom and still I couldn't get full contact with all the balls. I don't have enough 2 1/2" balls to try a fit with those.

Maybe it's for something besides billiards? This guy was a hoarder. The sellers tried to put similiar things together but they did include with this pool table, a dealer display cabinets for golf clubs thinking it was for cues.
 

Attachments

  • Diamond Rack b.jpg
    Diamond Rack b.jpg
    183.4 KB · Views: 23
maybe just the rack that held the balls that came in that shape box when they were sold.
That may be it. There is probably enough room to fit cardboard around each ball for protection during shipping. Kind of expensive piece of wood for packaging, with the curves, but labor was cheap back then.
 
2 1/4" or larger? Were they racked in a diamond formation?
I have no idea what sizes the poker sets were in 1910. Old Brunswick catalogs should help. I'm pretty sure they made smaller regular sets for home tables.

An old (1914) rule book describes the game with a 16 ball "triangle", but 16 balls don't form a triangle, so I think they must have meant a diamond.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top