I just returned from the National 8 Ball Team Championships for the APA in Vegas.
I must say that the experience strongly pushed me to consider ending my membership in the APA. What are they thinking with the cue ball??? I went out there expecting the best possible playing conditions. While the tables are sloppy buckets, they are at least passable. The cloth was average speed, maybe a hair fast for a bar table, so great! However, the cue ball is the Aramith green logo ball. This ball does not play correctly, plain and simple. I don't know if the rails are wrong, or if the ball is overweight. It plays like a slightly heavy ball. Really a big turn off. If Aramith is sponsoring this event, why in the world wouldn't they showcast their premier product, the Pro Cup cue ball. Ok, I'll take the regular Super Aramith. Ok, I'll take the plain old Red Circle. God, any real cue ball would do fine. On the table one of the vendors had, there was a Red Cirlce ball, and otherwise it was the same. It played night and day different...BETTER!!!
I asked the tournament directors about why they used that ball and the response was "that is what the vendor supplied". I suggested that this made it sound like they didn't really give the issue any thought. He suggested that this was probably the case. In the team match tables, they are all open. There is no reason they couldn't open all the tables and just charge a flat admittance fee to the playing area. $10 gets you into the table area for 24 hours...something like that. Alan Hopkins is able to pull this off effectively in PA...why can't a big organization like the APA handle it? My only guess is that they don't care. I almost laughed out loud at the captains meeting when they said "many of your players might not be used to playing on conditions this good..." That is for damn sure.
It is even more of a joke in the Masters division. If these are supposed to be the best of the best in the league, yet they play on way less than standard conditions, what does that say about the league's opinion of itself? To me it says that "we are a league of bangers that wouldn't know a heavy bar ball from a quality cue ball, and if you want to play at a high level go elsewhere."
If anyone is going to sound off and suggest that "a good player should be able to adjust to the equipment", post that in a different thread. This thread is for the people that assume that a game will reach a higher level if everyone maxes out their abilities on standardized equipment. Why waste time adjusting to different cue balls? The game of pool is meant to be played with a cue ball that is the same size, weight, and consistency (meaning the mass is distributed evenly so it rolls correctly) as the other balls. A situation that does not conform to this standard is a spin-off game from pool, not pool.
Thoughts?
KMRUNOUT
I must say that the experience strongly pushed me to consider ending my membership in the APA. What are they thinking with the cue ball??? I went out there expecting the best possible playing conditions. While the tables are sloppy buckets, they are at least passable. The cloth was average speed, maybe a hair fast for a bar table, so great! However, the cue ball is the Aramith green logo ball. This ball does not play correctly, plain and simple. I don't know if the rails are wrong, or if the ball is overweight. It plays like a slightly heavy ball. Really a big turn off. If Aramith is sponsoring this event, why in the world wouldn't they showcast their premier product, the Pro Cup cue ball. Ok, I'll take the regular Super Aramith. Ok, I'll take the plain old Red Circle. God, any real cue ball would do fine. On the table one of the vendors had, there was a Red Cirlce ball, and otherwise it was the same. It played night and day different...BETTER!!!
I asked the tournament directors about why they used that ball and the response was "that is what the vendor supplied". I suggested that this made it sound like they didn't really give the issue any thought. He suggested that this was probably the case. In the team match tables, they are all open. There is no reason they couldn't open all the tables and just charge a flat admittance fee to the playing area. $10 gets you into the table area for 24 hours...something like that. Alan Hopkins is able to pull this off effectively in PA...why can't a big organization like the APA handle it? My only guess is that they don't care. I almost laughed out loud at the captains meeting when they said "many of your players might not be used to playing on conditions this good..." That is for damn sure.
It is even more of a joke in the Masters division. If these are supposed to be the best of the best in the league, yet they play on way less than standard conditions, what does that say about the league's opinion of itself? To me it says that "we are a league of bangers that wouldn't know a heavy bar ball from a quality cue ball, and if you want to play at a high level go elsewhere."
If anyone is going to sound off and suggest that "a good player should be able to adjust to the equipment", post that in a different thread. This thread is for the people that assume that a game will reach a higher level if everyone maxes out their abilities on standardized equipment. Why waste time adjusting to different cue balls? The game of pool is meant to be played with a cue ball that is the same size, weight, and consistency (meaning the mass is distributed evenly so it rolls correctly) as the other balls. A situation that does not conform to this standard is a spin-off game from pool, not pool.
Thoughts?
KMRUNOUT