Disregard of referee's ruling may result in disciplinary action up to and including disqualification from further competition without refund of player's entry fee.I call my fouls since I was a kid.
For the cash or tournament play.
It’s not just ethics...if you don’t you’ll keep making them.
You call them for the good of your game.
Simple answer.... no.... they dont have to. If you asked is it ethical, then it's a completely different subject
I agree. In an ‘unrefereed‘ match, your opponent is the referee. If he doesn’t pay attention while you are shooting, he is neglecting his obligation and likely doesn’t deserve the benefit of your superior sportsmanship. That being said, continuing to shoot after fouling WOULD be unethical, regardless.The only time I do not necessarily agree with this is when my opponent is too busy playing around on their cell phone. If they are not paying attention I wont offer up that I fouled and that they have BIH, if I foul and they are not paying attention I will simply leave the table and sit down, I draw the line at trying to take another shot though. When I have an opponent that is paying attention I usually grab the cue ball and set it down near the kitchen if I foul which usually alerts them to the fact that they have BIH.
I agree wholeheartedly! But you know as well as I do there are many people with zero integrity. Win by any means is their goal.Every player should police themselves and call a foul on themselves whenever it occurs.
Professional golfers do it all the time. It is referred to as “The Integrity of Sportsmanship”.
If you win dishonestly, you genuinely concede your opponent is superior & you can’t beat ‘em.
I played last week and lost a match because I called a touch foul on myself.I agree wholeheartedly! But you know as well as I do there are many people with zero integrity. Win by any means is their goal.
And the numbers of integrity lacking people is growing exponentially every year.
There are exceptions. BCA and APA rules state if there is a possibility of a foul, the sitting player must call for a stop to the game, and have the shot watched by someone neutral. If this is not done, the call usually goes to the shooter. You'd be surprised how many times the shooter changes their mind about how to shoot the shot after you want it watched.I agree. In an ‘unrefereed‘ match, your opponent is the referee. If he doesn’t pay attention while you are shooting, he is neglecting his obligation and likely doesn’t deserve the benefit of your superior sportsmanship. That being said, continuing to shoot after fouling WOULD be unethical, regardless.
I agree. In an ‘unrefereed‘ match, your opponent is the referee. If he doesn’t pay attention while you are shooting, he is neglecting his obligation and likely doesn’t deserve the benefit of your superior sportsmanship. That being said, continuing to shoot after fouling WOULD be unethical, regardless.
Terry Griffiths, 1979 world snooker champ, was awarded a free ball...he disagreed with the ref...he wouldn’t take it.Disregard of referee's ruling may result in disciplinary action up to and including disqualification from further competition without refund of player's entry fee.
I call my fouls since I was a kid.
For the cash or tournament play.
It’s not just ethics...if you don’t you’ll keep making them.
You call them for the good of your game.
Again, you have to Remember a lot of people do not have a conscience.I "liked" this yesterday but that doesn't seem adequate. You call your fouls for the good of your game. What a great and powerful statement! You start cutting corners because you can get away with it and you introduce weakness into your game. To get in the fire you have to play the game the way it was meant to be played. I would hate to score a seemingly great memory but always remember in the back of my mind, "I won but I did get by with a couple fouls I didn't call on myself." Takes the bloom right off the rose!
"You call them for the good of your game" should be written on a rock somewhere!
Hu
Joe Tucker's American Rotation rules did that:I believe golf rules explicitly state that you have to call fouls on yourself. I don’t think that’s the case in any pro pool rules. ...
It's nice to have a "soft pillow" when you go to sleep at night, isn't it.I "liked" this yesterday but that doesn't seem adequate. You call your fouls for the good of your game. What a great and powerful statement! You start cutting corners because you can get away with it and you introduce weakness into your game. To get in the fire you have to play the game the way it was meant to be played. I would hate to score a seemingly great memory but always remember in the back of my mind, "I won but I did get by with a couple fouls I didn't call on myself." Takes the bloom right off the rose!
"You call them for the good of your game" should be written on a rock somewhere!
Hu
If this sport is going to pull itself out of the image of playing in basements it should adopt the same approach as golf professionals and make it mandatory at all levels.I think Shaw was not aware that the cue ball brushed the 5. I think he normally calls fouls on himself. I think he was completely focused on the 1-ball contact.
I think that both players should try to make sure that all rules are honored during the game. The game goes better that way. That includes calling fouls on yourself. For a professional, failing to do so gets you a reputation as a cheater.
There are lots of stories of top players calling fouls on themselves that no one else saw. Allen Hopkins called an unseen foul on himself against me when he was playing badly and under a lot of pressure. He won that match and the tournament. Karma.