I haven't missed a ball in weeks.
I do not think this is a good idea (see below)What works for me is to try to not watch my opponent at all during his time at the table... This is much easier said than done.... It has taken me alot of time and discipline... It will help to practice this when just bangin em with a buddy, league, cheap tourney, etc, etc.... But what really got me there in the end was when I picked up some noise cancelling ear buds for my ipod...
It depends on the level of player; this would not really work in upper tier play IMHO.For some reason, this method also sharks your opponent when they are weak or become weak during the match.... Not my intentions at all but it does happen... I'm not telling you to stall around on the guy either....
This is the 1st thing I teach at the beginning of the strategy 1/2 of my course, it is funny how many players don't do this; you get so many benefits and 0 setbacks by doing it. Great advice.When you approach the table, take a full walk around it chalking up as your eyes adjust... Then, its just you and the table....
This is a common misconception; if you are breathing, calculating and "centering" you will have a serious impact on your game, if you are slumping, beating yourself up and looking around the room you will also have a serious impact on your game, but in the wrong direction. If you do the former when you return to the table you will be more ready to win the game/match than if you do the latter.After all, there is absolutely nothing you can do to change the outcome from your chair....
IMHO I think you are mistaking "not wanting to watch the other guy" and "meditating" there is a huge difference; also pros are not "perfect" they make mistakes in their "chair skill practice" just like everyone else, they just USUALLY do it better than the rest of us.Anyone else try this??? I watch a ton of accustats and have seen a number of pros practice this during their down time....
Recently there was a rule set/instructional manual link posted here that I think covers what you want. I can't find the link right now, but I'm sure someone has it.Good approachI, on the other hand, like to keep track on what's my opponent doing. I first look for obvious weaknesses, and then do my best to exploit them. A few days ago I played against a much more skilled player. Sure, I used smart tactics like intentional white pots and defensive positioning, but I took him down with my favorite strategy when it comes to asymmetric play. I call it Artillery Bombardment
Instead of beating their accuracy with my own (which is impossible), I shoot into formations of my balls with full power. I make a good assessment though. I won hundreds and hundreds of matches that way. It's the most effective strategy against better opponents I've seen.
Yeah, I forgot to ask, does any of you use something similar as my "artillery bombardment" strategy (which I explained in my second post here...)?![]()
Recently there was a rule set/instructional manual link posted here that I think covers what you want. I can't find the link right now, but I'm sure someone has it.
I should mention that if you have absolutely no interest in pocketing the lowest-numbered ball, the caroms become a lot easier. If you do adopt Al's technique, you will soon discover that you want to keep as many pointless balls on the table for as long as possible. Among other advantages, if one of them falls in during an unsuccessful flight of the nine, you get to shoot at the nine a second time in one inning, an advantage Earl and Efren rarely get.... He was pretty good with caroms, too, sending the cue ball one, two or three cushions from the object ball towards the money. ...
I should also give an answer to the OP and others even if he is banned, what do I do when I am up against a stronger player than I? Well when going against a weaker player than I, I outmanuver them; so when playing a stronger player I just do the oppisate I go on the offense. It is not the same as Poolkillers/Black-Wing's AOO :rotflmao1: It is more like this if I am playing the weaker player and the offensive shot vs. the defenseive shot is lets just say a 60-40 proposition; against the weaker player I will take the defensive shot and against the stronger player I will take the offensive shot. This has to be at least a handicaps disparity between the 2 of us, if they are anywhere around my skill level the %'s are played as %'s are played.
I think a local player named "Hotel Al" was the prototypical bombardment guy. He was low-to-medium rated in the local handicapped 9-ball tournaments which meant I had to give him 2 or 3 in a race to 6. He knew perfectly well that he had no chance to run most racks. Lots of players with Al's level of pocketing skills never catch on to this. Al's genius was that he asked the next question, which few weak players ever do: if you're not going to run the table out, how can you win?
For those not really familiar with the rules of nine ball, if the nine goes in on a legal shot, you win the game right then and there. Many, many beginning nine ball players don't understand that. Maybe it's harsh to point out that they're clueless, but it is, simply, the truth. Here is Hotel Al's great discovery: if you can make the nine ball move at high speed on an early shot, it's got an excellent chance to fall in and then you win the game.
If Al was shooting the 1 ball, he would not play for shape on the 2. What would be the point? He would play to line up the cue-ball/2-ball pointed somewhere in the direction of the nine. And then he would let fly. He was pretty good with caroms, too, sending the cue ball one, two or three cushions from the object ball towards the money.
Why do weak players pretend that they are Efren or Earl? Why don't they play within their own game and with their own strengths? They have a lot to learn from Al.
Here is the theoretical basis of Al's technique: the rails are 10% pocket. (Measure it for yourself.) If you can get the nine ball to hit ten rails during a game, you're the odds-on favorite to win. It is simple mathematics.
There are two not so obvious advantages of Al's technique. Many good players panic when they see the nine flying freely around the table every other shot. Their knees buckle and their arms turn to spaghetti. Secondly, random shots often leave a safe position. It's not clear that Al ever tried to park the cue ball on a rail for improved safety possibilities, but that would be a good extension of his technique.
One of the most satisfying wins I ever had in those tournaments was against Al. One evening I decided that I would try to out-Al Al. Four of my six games were won by the nine falling early into some random pocket. At the end, Al looked shell-shocked.
Back when my friends and I were learning how to play pool we understood that we were not good enough to play nine ball so we played six ball (which is nine ball with three fewer balls). I think it is a much better game for players who run out maybe one in 50 or 100. And if you are the betting type you can put a dollar on the 3 and two on the 6. Also, six ball doesn't have the racking problems that nine ball has.... But it's a strategy many have, just go for the 9. There is a group of people I know that play cheap sets, usually partners. You hear them holler like monkeys across the room whenever anyone makes a 9 on the break or craps it in like it was the holy grail of pool, making a ball on accident.
I think a local player named "Hotel Al" was the prototypical bombardment guy. He was low-to-medium rated in the local handicapped 9-ball tournaments which meant I had to give him 2 or 3 in a race to 6. He knew perfectly well that he had no chance to run most racks. Lots of players with Al's level of pocketing skills never catch on to this. Al's genius was that he asked the next question, which few weak players ever do: if you're not going to run the table out, how can you win?
For those not really familiar with the rules of nine ball, if the nine goes in on a legal shot, you win the game right then and there. Many, many beginning nine ball players don't understand that. Maybe it's harsh to point out that they're clueless, but it is, simply, the truth. Here is Hotel Al's great discovery: if you can make the nine ball move at high speed on an early shot, it's got an excellent chance to fall in and then you win the game.
If Al was shooting the 1 ball, he would not play for shape on the 2. What would be the point? He would play to line up the cue-ball/2-ball pointed somewhere in the direction of the nine. And then he would let fly. He was pretty good with caroms, too, sending the cue ball one, two or three cushions from the object ball towards the money.
Why do weak players pretend that they are Efren or Earl? Why don't they play within their own game and with their own strengths? They have a lot to learn from Al.
Here is the theoretical basis of Al's technique: the rails are 10% pocket. (Measure it for yourself.) If you can get the nine ball to hit ten rails during a game, you're the odds-on favorite to win. It is simple mathematics.
There are two not so obvious advantages of Al's technique. Many good players panic when they see the nine flying freely around the table every other shot. Their knees buckle and their arms turn to spaghetti. Secondly, random shots often leave a safe position. It's not clear that Al ever tried to park the cue ball on a rail for improved safety possibilities, but that would be a good extension of his technique.
One of the most satisfying wins I ever had in those tournaments was against Al. One evening I decided that I would try to out-Al Al. Four of my six games were won by the nine falling early into some random pocket. At the end, Al looked shell-shocked.[/QUOTE]
Bob-this is great.
Did you recite the phrase: Where dat 9ball??, before launching a 'strategic blast'?
We have a guy down here, that with BIH with 4 hangers, will ride the 9. I think it's a lifestyle.
thanks, for the funny post.
But I would disagree with the use of "accident" above. I think such players fully intend to make 9 even if they often fail to guess just where.
A useful concept in pool (and elsewhere in life) is "fake it til you make it".
Act extremely confident even if the guy intimidates you. Mirror what you see actual pros do. For example, you ever hear a pro say "I hit it too hard" or "I missed cuz I was trying so hard for shape on the next ball"? No, that stuff is amateurish. You go back to your chair (maybe with a grimace, like you just ate a bad chicken wing) and sit down.
Does the other guy know you're not as good as him? With the right confident vibe, maybe you can fool him for a little while. If you can make him worry for even a second that you might be stronger than he is, it might affect his next shot.
I really like your posts. You always have something constructive to say. This is a really good tip. Please keep them coming.
I haven't missed a ball in weeks.