I don't follow this stuff closely. I thought Shane beat Sky. No?So Sky hasn't been paid in full?
But he didn't play the rematch because he couldn't get his monies right to place the bet?
Something is a lil off with this whole thing...
Yessir, that's correct. So I assumed the party that has not paid in full yet would be Dennis'... because Im pretty sure I heard the commentators say on night 1 that originally Sky and Dennis had planned a rematch and this SVB match fell into place because Sky couldn't get his sides money right.... I could be wrong thoughI don't follow this stuff closely. I thought Shane beat Sky. No?
So Sky hasn't been paid in full?
But he didn't play the rematch because he couldn't get his monies right to place the bet?
Something is a lil off with this whole thing...
I'm confused. Not the first time.Yessir, that's correct. So I assumed the party that has not paid in full yet would be Dennis'... because Im pretty sure I heard the commentators say on night 1 that originally Sky and Dennis had planned a rematch and this SVB match fell into place because Sky couldn't get his sides money right.... I could be wrong though
Or payment for the Show.Perhaps he was due a stipend to cover travel expenses from either his backer(s) and or the promotion
Or payment for the Show.
Yeah Dennis didn't play nearly as well as he usually does on a 9 footer...And they want to compare bar box to 9’. Ahhhh yea right!
Sent from my iPhone using AzBilliards Forums
Is anyone comparing them? I thought it was pretty common knowledge that they are very different games.And they want to compare bar box to 9’. Ahhhh yea right!
Sent from my iPhone using AzBilliards Forums