i cant read through all this right now, but how in the world would you know this unless you had access to all their books....
"No profit has been made other than the satisfaction of providing the event worldwide through the internet and proving that they have the capability to do it."
listen, agreed, tar is awesome. ok, back to the subject, who should have the right to call themselves "sponsors" of an event. these companies have associated their names with names of professional players for potential profit?? if all the players say, yeah, great, let hard times associate my name with their website and poolhall. ok, but i dont see this as having happened.
it's funny because most of us complain about the money, then when somebody raises a legitimate concern about the money the very players object. no wonder we are stuck!
"No profit has been made other than the satisfaction of providing the event worldwide through the internet and proving that they have the capability to do it."
listen, agreed, tar is awesome. ok, back to the subject, who should have the right to call themselves "sponsors" of an event. these companies have associated their names with names of professional players for potential profit?? if all the players say, yeah, great, let hard times associate my name with their website and poolhall. ok, but i dont see this as having happened.
it's funny because most of us complain about the money, then when somebody raises a legitimate concern about the money the very players object. no wonder we are stuck!