iusedtoberich said:I will trust the points you made about how smoking could possibly help in some cases.
IUTBRich,
Don't trust the points. They are false, based on either flawed studies, or statistics taken out of context. To think that cigarettes are going to help your health is foolish. Your chances of making it to age 70 as a lifelong smoker are about 10%, your chances of making it to age 60 about 50/50 - where exactly does this great benefit come in???
Colin probably does not realize that most (around 70%) of the info in medical journals is wrong - they are preliminary studies, retrospective studies, poorly designed studies - or just good studies whose results are inappropriately extrapolated - they are the very appropriate first step in the scientific process - find an association, report in the journal, then later try to find if the associated findings are cause and effect (usually NOT). None of the info he cites is reliable in any way. Many of the results he cited are based on the fact that the cigarette smokers don't live long enough to develop as many of these problems as the rest of the population. Their age adjusted risk is actually extremely high in the case of colon cancer. Realize that the cigarette advocates have promulgated this type of pseudo-science for a long time, not Colin's fault.
I do however, support anyone's right to smoke (its just my job to advise them not to). I think the state governments and the federal government's attacks on the cigarette industry are TOTALLY unconstitutional. A stiff warning on the package should be sufficient; false claims and advertising should be punished. People enjoy auto racing, bungee jumping, hang gliding, swimming with sharks, base jumping, and motorcycle riding. Should we outlaw all of these things? Perhaps we just need to outlaw the politicians and lawyers. What a mess.