BHE and FHE English

I don't know what Roger said, but sliding or not has little or nothing to do with squirt, and there's just as much squirt when hitting high as when hitting low - the difference is the effectiveness of the swerve that comes with it. Swerve acts more quickly with a high hit than with a low one, because the CB is forced downward by hitting (at least a little) downward on top of the ball and by "vertical squirt" which is also a downward force in that case.

The quicker-acting swerve with a high hit looks like less squirt, and the effect is the same as less squirt, but it's not really less squirt. Try hitting a hard sidespin shot with the CB frozen to the rail and you'll find yourself aiming on the opposite side of your intended CB path because of this.

pj
chgo

Fairly well said.

Many times 'disagreements' come down to vernacular &/or
a certain parameter being left out of the discussion.

Sometimes one is speaking about the overall practical NET effect while the other person is speaking about the 'gross' amount of a component.

Miscommunication or lack of communication is probably the largest problem in the world.

Again, rather well stated.
 
That may indeed be the case.

The problem with hitting along the rail analogy is you are introducing friction, which is the exact point Roger made to me. Immediate roll = no friction = no squirt. His point is deflection is slide and there is no slide with full roll. I don't think you achieve perfect full roll no matter how high or cleanly you hit the ball but it does SEEM less. As you say it may be the swerve is greater and evens it out some. I don't doubt you. I just noticed when I hit the cue with top left and aim at a point on the far rail it hits the point pretty accurately but with low left it is off by much more. It could even be I hit harder with low as a matter of habit.

It does all seem to boil down to friction.
 
I've watched Dr Dave's videos as well as Joe Tucker's videos on the subject, but I still don't know exactly when to use BHE or FHE.

I've found the natural pivot point on my cue, and this is what I've gotten so far:

-I'll use BHE on fast shots, or short shots.
-I'll use FHE on long slow shots, or very slow short shots.


-I'll use a combination of the two on...well I've just used both together and it's worked, but I don't know really when to use both.


So I guess to sum up, I'd just like some parameters of when to use either one exclusively, and when to use a combination.
Did you see my latest video and article on this topic. They cover your questions fairly well. Here they are:

NV E.2 - Back-Hand (BHE) and Front-Hand English (FHE), from HAPS I

"HAPS - Part II: BHE and FHE" (BD, December, 2014)

I hope that helps,
Dave
 
I just noticed when I hit the cue with top left and aim at a point on the far rail it hits the point pretty accurately but with low left it is off by much more.
As PJ pointed out, net CB deflection is the result of both squirt and swerve. Swerve happens almost immediately with soft follow shots with sidespin, which results in less effective or net CB deflection. With draw sidespin shots, the CB slides longer making the swerve (CB path curving) occur over a larger distance before the CB heads in a straight line. Because the swerve occurs later, it doesn't cancel as much as the squirt effect, so the net or effective CB deflection will be larger with draw shots (especially with more speed).

FYI, more info on this topic can be found here:

effects of follow and draw on CB deflection

I hope that helps,
Dave
 
...[Roger's] point is deflection is slide and there is no slide with full roll.
Deflection isn't slide. Unless you're hitting very high on the CB it slides initially on every shot - but it doesn't deflect on every shot.

I don't think you achieve perfect full roll no matter how high or cleanly you hit the ball
Maybe not with side spin, but you certainly can without it - if you hit near the miscue limit above center (actually about 80% of maximum high) it will be fully rolling immediately.

pj
chgo
 
If deflection isn't slide you mean the cue ball rolls sideways off the center line? What about a stun shot where there is no roll at all? Isn't the cue ball sliding off center then when it deflects?

I would like to hear Dave's idea on this point. When a cue ball deflects is it sliding, rolling, some of both or it doesn't matter. If it moves to the left (with right English) it has to be doing something to get there and if it isn't rolling at all it seems like it has to be sliding.

Assuming it could be doing either the friction of sliding would seem to come into play more than on a rolling ball. I think that is what Dave means about the swerve occurring later. A sliding deflected ball doesn't tend to come back until it starts to roll where a rolling deflected ball begins the return swerve sooner so the net effect is the rolling deflected ball ends up almost straight where the sliding ball may not have a chance to correct.

The real question isn't so much a technical one for me. I just was looking to find out if it made sense that I needed less correction on a long hard hit force follow with spin than a long power draw with spin and it seems that is reasonable and not just my imagination.

And yes I meant with side spin I am not sure you can achieve immediate forward roll. It does seem to slip off before rolling but that is not based on any scientific testing, just the way it appears.
 
If deflection isn't slide you mean the cue ball rolls sideways off the center line?
Yes, if it's hit far enough above center to roll immediately, then it rolls in the deflected direction. Deflection and sliding aren't directly related at all - they happen at the same time on many shots but for different reasons.

What about a stun shot where there is no roll at all? Isn't the cue ball sliding off center then when it deflects?
Yes, but the sliding and the deflecting don't have anything to do with each other.

There's also some sliding as swerve happens on side spin shots, but again it doesn't have anything directly to do with CB deflection (except to "erase" some of it).

I would like to hear Dave's idea on this point.
I'm sure he'll accommodate, and he probably has lots of related information on his site. I learned a lot about it from him.

When a cue ball deflects is it sliding, rolling, some of both or it doesn't matter. If it moves to the left (with right English) it has to be doing something to get there and if it isn't rolling at all it seems like it has to be sliding.
CB deflection (squirt) happens when the CB rotates horizontally against the cue tip during side spin contact, pushing itself and the tip in opposite sideways directions.

pj
chgo
 
Last edited:
I just wonder what effect the cloth friction has on deflection compared to deflection with no friction when rolling. It seems like the friction would lessen the deflection then lessen the swerve. Kind of like a small sideways motion would continue Indefinitely in space or for a long time on ice, etc.

Mostly I am concluding there are differences in the net impact on a shot with high vs low and the deflection turns out to be greater with center or low than with high. That is the practical take away for me.

As for the amount of discussion devoted to theory, to me, that is what forums are all about. Those who are interested can take the time to discuss things they are interested in without having to justify the importance of the discussion. Those who are not interested can simply find other topics they are interested in. I appreciate your input and thank you for it.
 
Do not forget the friction of the balls.....clean, polished v dirty.

Friction is the rubbing of two surfaces, so the ball condition is also a varible as does it's weight.

FWIW........we had a really high humid conditions recently, and was truely amazing how that effected the roll of the balls. This is why 3 cushion tables are heated. To keep playing conditions consistent, oh and these guys are fanatics about using clean balls.

Should watch some 3 cushion to see a different style of play and stroke.
 
Last edited:
I just wonder what effect the cloth friction has on deflection compared to deflection with no friction when rolling. It seems like the friction would lessen the deflection then lessen the swerve. Kind of like a small sideways motion would continue Indefinitely in space or for a long time on ice, etc.
CB deflection is just like hitting center ball in a slightly different direction - it doesn't matter whether the ball is rolling or sliding, or whether the cloth is clean or dirty; the ball will go in that direction regardless until diverted by something else, like swerve.

Mostly I am concluding there are differences in the net impact on a shot with high vs low and the deflection turns out to be greater with center or low than with high. That is the practical take away for me.
Good luck with that.

pj
chgo
 
If deflection isn't slide you mean the cue ball rolls sideways off the center line? What about a stun shot where there is no roll at all? Isn't the cue ball sliding off center then when it deflects?

I would like to hear Dave's idea on this point. When a cue ball deflects is it sliding, rolling, some of both or it doesn't matter. If it moves to the left (with right English) it has to be doing something to get there and if it isn't rolling at all it seems like it has to be sliding.
First, we need to be careful with terminology. Total or net or effective CB deflection is the end result of of both squirt (sometimes also called "deflection") and swerve. Throw also affects some shots (some more than others). A complete summary and demonstration of all squirt, swerve, and throw effects can be found here:

complete summary of all squirt, swerve, and throw effects (with supporting resources)

CB slide or ball/cloth conditions have absolutely no effect on the amount of squirt. For more info, see what causes squirt.

Swerve depends on shot speed, shot distance, the amount of sidespin, cue elevation, and ball/cloth conditions. See the effects summary resource page for explanations and demonstrations.

Vertical tip position (for draw and follow) also affect squirt and swerve. For more info, see: squirt and swerve draw and follow effects.

Again, net CB deflection is a result of the combined effects of squirt and swerve.


Assuming it could be doing either the friction of sliding would seem to come into play more than on a rolling ball. I think that is what Dave means about the swerve occurring later. A sliding deflected ball doesn't tend to come back until it starts to roll where a rolling deflected ball begins the return swerve sooner so the net effect is the rolling deflected ball ends up almost straight where the sliding ball may not have a chance to correct.
Again, squirt has nothing to do with the sliding phase of CB motion, and swerve occurs only while the CB is sliding. Once the CB stops sliding and is rolling, it moves in a straight line. The offset and angle of this line depends on both squirt and swerve. When the CB slides over a larger distance (with more speed and/or with backspin) it takes longer for the CB to complete it's sliding and swerve phase, and the squirt effect will be more noticeable since the CB moves out more before the swerve brings it back some (or a lot with added cue elevation). Therefore, in general, net CB deflection will be greater for fast-speed shots and for draw shots. For more info and demonstrations, see net CB deflection speed effects.

The real question isn't so much a technical one for me. I just was looking to find out if it made sense that I needed less correction on a long hard hit force follow with spin than a long power draw with spin and it seems that is reasonable and not just my imagination.
You are correct. You need to adjust for net CB deflection more with fast speed and with draw shots. That's why FHE is more appropriate for slow, long, follow shots, and BHE is more appropriate for short or fast shots (especially with draw). For more info, see backhand english (BHE) and front-hand english (FHE).

And yes I meant with side spin I am not sure you can achieve immediate forward roll. It does seem to slip off before rolling but that is not based on any scientific testing, just the way it appears.
Immediate roll is strictly possible only with a level cue (where there is no swerve) and with moderate amounts of sidespin, where the tip can strike the CB high enough. For more info, see: natural roll, maximum offset, and overspin.

I hope that helps. Please look through the resources and videos if you haven't done so yet. They should answer most questions you or others might have.

Regards,
Dave
 
I really like Dr. Dave's presentation of this (and just about every other thing he explains). One point he does not seem to address is the difference in squirt with top vs bottom or center English. Roger Long pointed this out to me (and mentioned he had a little debate with Dr. Dave on it too) and I believe Roger is correct. If the ball doesn't slide it doesn't squirt much at all.

So a very high hit (top 40% or more) ball that has immediate roll deflects very little even if hit hard. I can't use BHE on long hard hit high English without getting too much correction. Often I can even live with a simple parallel shift on these shots which is all I use on short soft shots. I actually favor a slight front hand correction for hard follow and BHE for hard low or center where there seems to be more squirt.

I can test this to extremes and get squirt but it is almost a miscue and is not a shot I would normally use. It seems to be a matter of how quickly the ball rolls. To get squirt with high I have to hit it WAY off center and VERY hard. This is not true with center or low.

I am not saying there is NO squirt, just not nearly as much. It is very hard to get un biased results so I don't hold my experiences out as anything but anecdotal. I see many players who believe all kinds of things based on experience that don't prove out in a lab. That is what I like most about Dr. Dave's explanations, they are backed with some pretty clear test results. It is hard to argue with a guy with a Mechanical Engineering degree and a Masters in Physics when it comes to WHY things do what they do :-).

I would like to hear what others think about this.
Hi Skipbales,

High english is problematic with BHE, which I have been studying for several years. The reason is basically the Coriolis effect, meaning, when we hit a CB high with side english, the swerve takes much earlier, exaggerating the need for swerve compensation.

Hence, I either adjust my alignment a little, hit harder, lengthen my bridge, or hit as low as I can to allow natural roll to come into play before contact with the OB.

The best way depends on the shot and your experience.

While it's not easy, keep in mind that any use of side english using any aiming method is problematic with high striking of the CB, and of course, long shots using side english.

Colin
 
On very extreme edges of the cue ball hits, perhaps some of those posting to this thread are jumping the cue ball a bit (extra) into the air? If one player's cue ball is getting extra hang time...
 
On very extreme edges of the cue ball hits, perhaps some of those posting to this thread are jumping the cue ball a bit (extra) into the air? If one player's cue ball is getting extra hang time...
I've found any jumping of the CB to be insignificant... mainly because we rarely hit down on a ball in a way that jumps using side english. On the odd occasion, I play heavy english on a masse shot... that is rare though and may require some aim compensation.
 
Yes. But I see some players who do some strange things with high follow especially when trying to learn BHE action.
 
Yes. But I see some players who do some strange things with high follow especially when trying to learn BHE action.

Matt,

Do you generally work with lesser players?

I'm just asking because when the discussion is regarding things that I would say 'players' would be doing, you bring up 'faults' that are more related to beginners or slightly better than beginners.

I'm just trying to gage your perspective.

Thanks,
Rick
 
Good question, Rick. I work with all levels of players. And I don't mean to sound patronizing in my posts as if I'm talking to raw beginners. IMO, the sheer levels of skill and knowledge for the average AZ reader is way beyond the average league player. And then the knowledge of those who post and not merely lurk is further still. Finally you have the instructor/aiming sub-forum posters, where I spend most of my AZ time. Really good players and knowledgeable players, teachers/pros.

A lot of my recent observations (and therefore posts here at AZ and articles at my site) have to do with finding commonalities with pros--and the lowest amateurs are of course, almost the polar opposite. In between the two are a lot of the people who pay for lessons--7s and 8s with time and money on their hands... I think some here can relate to that... I also mention some of the commonalities I see with beginners to get feedback. Thankfully the feedback here is raw and real. If we can add civility to our discourse I'd be thrilled...

But trying to combine high follow with BHE is hardly the domain of rank amateurs!

I appreciate your asking. Thanks.
 
Good question, Rick. I work with all levels of players. And I don't mean to sound patronizing in my posts as if I'm talking to raw beginners. IMO, the sheer levels of skill and knowledge for the average AZ reader is way beyond the average league player. And then the knowledge of those who post and not merely lurk is further still. Finally you have the instructor/aiming sub-forum posters, where I spend most of my AZ time. Really good players and knowledgeable players, teachers/pros.

A lot of my recent observations (and therefore posts here at AZ and articles at my site) have to do with finding commonalities with pros--and the lowest amateurs are of course, almost the polar opposite. In between the two are a lot of the people who pay for lessons--7s and 8s with time and money on their hands... I think some here can relate to that... I also mention some of the commonalities I see with beginners to get feedback. Thankfully the feedback here is raw and real. If we can add civility to our discourse I'd be thrilled...

But trying to combine high follow with BHE is hardly the domain of rank amateurs!

I appreciate your asking. Thanks.

Thanks for reply, Matt.

You do know the origin & meaning of the word amateur, don't you.

Best,
Rick
 
Back
Top