poolnut said:
			
		
	
	
		
		
			A fast 7 foot table makes the game just as interesting as it would be on a 9 foot table.  Pocketing balls is clearly easier.  Position play is not.
		
		
	 
This is a damn good point....a lightning quick 7 footer with buckets, crappy rails, a mudball, and a lean provides it's own challenges....cue ball control is essential when you could scratch on any shot  :grin-square: 
A sweet 9 foot Diamond or GC with tiny pockets is a great test and a thing of beauty.....
I think Easy-E told me he used to have a 7 footer with TINY pockets that he practiced on because that was all that fit at his place at the time.....and he still carried a strong game on a 9 footer.....IMHO, the best player adapts and performs on whatever is available....wheter 7 or 10 feet, he is up to the challenge and will find a way to win....
I see similarities in golf.....you have links courses, and you have traditional tree-lined courses, and so on.....some are as short as 5000 yards (take the kids out), some are almost 8000.....some with fast greens, others with slow....some with nice fairways, others are goat tracks....the best players can perform and find a way to manage the course....
Someone mentioned 9 foot goals in basketball.....in normal high school games, our forwards where 6'5" or plus.....as a shorty, I could barely dunk in perfect conditions, so it was never gonna happen in a serious game.....but every rare now and then, we'd end up at an outdoor court with 9 foot goals....it was different, but I enjoyed feeling like air jordan  :grin-square:   And although the goal was shorter, the same guys who were a power on the block were still a power, and the shooters were still shooters....
My two cents  
