Barbara said:Hey Blackjack!
I came into the pool scene just before the Mackey thing and was more involved with playing than learning about the politics. Could you explain what happened with that tour?
Barbara
Barbara,
Over the years I have addressed this subject both here and at RSB at great length. If you would like, send me an e-mail (blkjackds12@yahoo.com) with your number and we can discuss it over the phone. I'm sure you will find that chapter of our sport to be very intriguing, and quite similar to what we are hearing about these days with Mr. Trudeau.
Snapshot9 said:I must say, I like how the IPT is going much more than the UPA.
I sincerely offered my services to help the UPA in any way I could,
and I am educated (2 college degrees), experienced, and have
been involved with Pool for almost 44 years, on many levels, and
Mr. Alvarez, after a few emails, dismissed me like 'who am I, that
I dare to offer to help them'. That is an attitude, that is geared for
failure.
Scott,
The main problem was getting in touch with you at the time. I explained that to you several months ago. I also remember discussing that issue with Frank Alvarez. At the time you did not have a phone number for us to contact you. That is probably why you have not heard from Frank. I am more than willing to work with you and I have told you that. The last I heard from you, you were involving yourself with running a tour in Kansas ( I forget which one you were assciated with). Feel free to get with me at any time, hopefully we can speak on the phone and not through PM's or e-mails this time.
Jeff said:So, I'd like to hear from BJ exactly how he wants all participants to be "united" and I'd like to also know WHY anyone would unite---and STAY united---if the situation established doesn't satisfy his/her reason for being in pool. Perhaps this is just a word problem, but I don't think so. It seems to me to be a conceptual thinking problem for those trying so hard, such as BJ, Hopkins, Siegel, to make pool successful.
Unity, as Vagabond mentions requires compromise. The reality is that cohesiveness has not existed between any of the tours and the industry. Don Mackey played favorites among tour sponsors which didn't help matters at the time. In the end, he turned his back on the billiard industry support which we so desperately need as a foundation to guide our sport to the next level. In short, we need to show potential sponsors (from outside our industry) that we have a solid, binding relationship within our own industry. We don't have that. That is why nobody will come near us with a 10 foot pole. If I'm Proctor & Gambel, and the IPT comes to me in hopes of doing business with me, they will hire a legal team to assess our track record and review financial data to see if professional pool is a good investment. We're not. Face it. With every disaster our reputation gets worse and worse. We have trouble co-existing within our industry because separate entities have separate agendas.
With unity, I am talking about having a common goal and working towards it. The BCA was formed to be the uniting entity for our sport and our industry. I'm not sure why they exist anymore, if someone out there knows, please tell me. I'm willing to listen and learn about that subject.
My plan is so simple that it just might work - and before anyone says anything to the contrary - its not about ME. It is about moving our sport in a direction at all levels, not just the professional level. It is about guiding the industry. Vagabond, I completely disagree with you when you say it can never happen. We have been conditioned to believe that. We have been conditioned to accept that. The problem with that, is that its not true. If we get enough positive people and enough positive energy behind it, it can succeed. If during our quest we run into someone that is unwilling to work with us, move on to someone else that will. I completely agree with using the PGA as a model to build our sport, but we need an organization such as the USGA as well. Anyone that has sat at the table with me and discussed this has heard me say that over and over. Without a governing body to protect the interests of the game, we will continue to bounce from tour to tour, and we will continue to put our faith in money that has been generated outside our own industry. The money exists within our own industry. The pro tours aren't seeing any of that money because we have not attempted to earn the trust within our industry. In some cases we haven't even attempted it. This may or may not be a step in the right direction. I haven't heard anyone come up with a contingency plan if the IPT doesn't work out.
In closing, I would like to say that I completely understand that people are excited about this tour. I would be too, but I see things from the standpoint of how this will affect the sport in the long term. It is not my intention to detract people away from this tour, but I feel that we have every right to be concerned, and if we were wise we would proceed cautiously. More money is not the answer to all of our problems. Money helps, but there are internal problems that exist below the surface that the IPT should be aware of. I'm definite that JAM would agree with me on that. If they are not careful, those "internal" problems could come back to cause the implosion of their tour. Right now everyone is happy, everyone is exicted, and everyone is glad about the money - what about those internal problems? Those problems are not going to disappear.
Last edited: