Hold on, I gotta go out and get a violin to play a sad song while reading all of your weaseling crybaby post. It just seems appropriate.What game? This is a bit of a challenge as I view you and Dr. Dave as having completely different worldviews that extend far beyond pool aiming systems.
For instance I’m merely a B.S. level engineer, I think Dr. Dave is going to smoke me in any math related game. Meanwhile, if we’re playing a game where we are rewarded for the best use of food stamps I’m quite sure you’re winning this one. I just don’t have the requisite experience.
Pool wise, yup I’m a casual player. Pool is a number 3 priority for me behind enjoying my life and securing enough funds that I can continue doing so. You can kill me at a pool table and I’ll still be enjoy it.
More PJ anti-feel posts when he was lucid:I'd use feel - unlike you, that fact doesn't give me hives.
You claimed to be able to shoot feel-free - now all you gotta do is describe your "objective" alignment.
pj <- more crickets
chgo
Newsgroups: rec.sport.billiard
From: "Patrick Johnson" <pjm...@concentric.net>
Date: 1998/04/21
Subject: Re: what is the triangle aiming system?
Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
>Understanding the carom tangent has become one of my aiming techniques in
>games that don’t require caroms. I believe this is partly what creates
intuitive >players
The carom tangent helps my aiming, too. Visualizing in tangible, physical
terms is always best for me, and seeing the contact point as the one which
will send the cue ball along the tangent line (assuming no draw or follow)
makes it all more "real" for me, actually helping me to align the contact
points more clearly. Of course, it also adds a lot to my visualization and
control of shape.
When Pat Johnson was somewhat LUCID:
One thing I consciously try to avoid, however, is "intuitive" shooting. To
me, this means unconscious use of information which is more effectively and
consistently used if done consciously. Consciously applied information also
becomes part of my shot-making "arsenal" applicable to less typical shots,
and another building block in my learning process (rather than one more
deposit into the intuitive "black box"). Also, when I'm "off" only the
things I can consciously apply will reliably get me back "on." Trying to
regain my "feel" is like groping around in the dark.
Pat Johnson
Last edited: