How often have we seen this layout, say from a bad position play? The winning ball is by the pocket but the guy hooked himself behind the red ball, pulls out a jump cue he used 4 times before, hops over the ball, wins game (or even makes a good hit or it's another non-game winning ball). No skill needed past $60 to spend on a cue, no punishment for bad position play. This situation is a totally different setup if one has to kick if they can't clear the ball with a full cue, or the amount of skill needed to jump with a full cue. Yes jumping well with tough shots is as hard as kicking, but jumping just good enough to change the outcome of the game with a jump cue is trivial. That is the point I am making, good enough is good enough in most cases, some C/B level player does not need to make a table length jump with draw to beat another C/B player, just making a legal hit is a huge benefit or making an easy ball by a pocket. Not everyone is a 750 Fargo playing a 720 Fargo where you need much higher skill levels in everything to win a game, and even then one jump shot made with a jump cue that still makes it way easier than with a full cue can change the match. How many times has the US lost a Mosconi Cup match due to a jump cue? Many times. Would they have lost those games if the guy had to jump with a full cue? Maybe but much less likely. Heck, I swear half the games Albin wins at Mosconi has been with a jump cue or with a fluke when a missed ball still goes somewhere.
View attachment 640242
And I guess, even with that shot, if they have the skills to make it then great, the fact they are at the table is my fault
