CJ or The Scorpion?

That's two very different levels of play. Archer is one of the best of all time and his list of major titles is endless. CJ was a very fine player and a strong action player whose "A" game was crazy strong, but let's not put him in a discussion with the game's legends. He is far from that.

In the 1990s, when both Archer and CJ were both in their prime, Archer (along with Jon Kucharo and Wade Crane) was considered to have the best break in the game, and I'm not sure that there was anything CJ did better than Archer.
 
Last edited:
CJ was only dominant in his own mind.
No time to belittle a champion. CJ gained the #1 ranking on the PBT, the primary pro tour of his day, in what I believe was 1996. Among those playing on that tour at the time were future BCA Hall of Famers Archer, Hall, Davenport, Strickland, Souquet, Bustamante, Reyes, Parica, Varner and Rempe as well as several other worldbeaters. He was quite a player but comparing him to an Archer is just a bit over the top.
 
No time to belittle a champion. CJ gained the #1 ranking on the PBT, the primary pro tour of his day, in what I believe was 1996. Among those playing on that tour at the time were future BCA Hall of Famers Archer, Hall, Davenport, Strickland, Souquet, Bustamante, Reyes, Parica, Varner and Rempe as well as several other worldbeaters. He was quite a player but comparing him to an Archer is just a bit over the top.
I agree, he was a great player. Maybe the lower tier of the upper level pros in the USA. But if you read his posts on here the past 20 years, which I'm sure you have, he was the second coming according to himself. That's what prompted my response:)
 
Yeah, can't compare CJ to Archer. CJ definitely played well enough to win a set here and there against JA (or anyone), but he'd be the underdog for sure.
 
They gambled CJ won 3 sets .Won a set 3 days in a row. JA was more of a tournament player. I believe it was right after JA won his world championship.
 
They gambled CJ won 3 sets .Won a set 3 days in a row. JA was more of a tournament player. I believe it was right after JA won his world championship.
I'm sure CJ beat him many more times than that. The difference is that Archer was probably a Top 5 player in the world for fifteen consecutive years. You can't say that about more than a few that ever played the game (Mosconi, Greenleaf, Strickland, Sigel, Varner, SVB, and Mizerak come to mind).
 
No time to belittle a champion. CJ gained the #1 ranking on the PBT, the primary pro tour of his day, in what I believe was 1996. ...
That was 1995. Wiley had the #1 ranking through the first part of the year thanks to a couple of second-place finishes and a 3rd. He didn't win any of the tournaments. At the end of the year he was 4th in points and 5th in money (with $25,675, according to Pool & Billiard Magazine).

1996 was the year that Wiley and some others split from the PBT and formed the Professional CueSports Association. So Wiley didn't play many PBT events in 1996.
 
That was 1995. Wiley had the #1 ranking through the first part of the year thanks to a couple of second-place finishes and a 3rd. He didn't win any of the tournaments. At the end of the year he was 4th in points and 5th in money (with $25,675, according to Pool & Billiard Magazine).

1996 was the year that Wiley and some others split from the PBT and formed the Professional CueSports Association. So Wiley didn't play many PBT events in 1996.
Thanks for that. I was going on memory. I did remember that he was ranked #1 at one point.
 
That was 1995. Wiley had the #1 ranking through the first part of the year thanks to a couple of second-place finishes and a 3rd. He didn't win any of the tournaments. At the end of the year he was 4th in points and 5th in money (with $25,675, according to Pool & Billiard Magazine).

1996 was the year that Wiley and some others split from the PBT and formed the Professional CueSports Association. So Wiley didn't play many PBT events in 1996.
1996, the year the players cut their throat. So sad what happened to pro pool.
 
Back
Top