I agree with the comments that you could take the book as is and make a completely different movie, whether it would be better than TCOM or not would still be a question. I think it very well might be.
The birds in Germany singing TK 6 ....:grin:
Ralph or somebody else please, what is the full name of Eddies car
Cadillac ,,,, --- ...?
Need help - thx from Germany
:smile:
Clearly there is no comparison whatsoever between Paul Newman's acting performances in The Hustler and TCOM. Paul Newman was magnificent in The Hustler and barely acceptable in TCOM.
But in all fairness, in most cases an actor must work within the restraints of the screenplay, his fellow actors, and the production itself. Clearly TCOM could not stand up to The Hustler, different levels entirely.
J
Originally Posted by jimmyg View Post
Clearly there is no comparison whatsoever between Paul Newman's acting performances in The Hustler and TCOM. Paul Newman was magnificent in The Hustler and barely acceptable in TCOM.
But in all fairness, in most cases an actor must work within the restraints of the screenplay, his fellow actors, and the production itself. Clearly TCOM could not stand up to The Hustler, different levels entirely.
J
I must admit, when he won the Academy Award for best actor in TCOM role, I was quite surprised, tho it did feel good it happened in a billiard movie.:grin-square: But George C. Scott.........Thumbs UP.
That's it. Those old Cadillacs were BIG cars.
.
The birds in Germany singing TK 6 ....:grin:
Ralph or somebody else please, what is the full name of Eddies car
Cadillac ,,,, --- ...?
Need help - thx from Germany
:smile:
I thought Paul Newman's acting in The Color of Money was great. I thought the pool in The Hustler was better ... I think some of the shots were actually done by Mosconi.
You must have not seen any of the low budget pool movies....most of them are absolutely terrible. I am not saying the Color Of Money is good or anything, but it is much better then some of the pool movies that have been made in the last decade or so. I know that may be hard to believe.![]()
" The Hustler " the novel by Walter Tevis had none of the romantic melodrama that was injected into the movie. It was just a very well written terse rendering of the pool world.
I liked the book very much and also thought the movie is a classic. There is much more pool in the book than in the movie.
TCOM was great for pool if not a great movie compared to the " Hustler "..
Mr. Overlord, I have a expressed a slightly different take on this subject before... Yes, there is more actual pool in the "Hustler" book, than in the movie. But IMO, perhaps that is why the movie was such a well received 'artistic' and commercial success !...It is more about life's dramatic realities, than it is about pool...Much like DeNiro's "Raging Bull" was less about boxing, and more about exposing Jake LaMotta's awkward human frailties.
Even given the fact, that both movies featured the most popular actor's of our time, it is doubtful either one would have enjoyed the popularity they did, had the emphasis been on pool, or boxing... There are simply too few avid boxing or pool nuts. (like us)...So had either sport been the 'main' focus of either film, the rest of the movie-going world, would have almost certainly said ..."Ho hum" !
It has also been noted, that the only reason Newman got the best actor Oscar for TCOM, is because he had been overlooked for his outstanding performance, in the Hustler, and his many other great roles. Sadly, a movie based strictly on pool, will never be a winner..Even with good actor's.."Pool House Junkies" certainly proved that !!!![]()
Forrest Whittaker gold in that one scene
was the best acting of the entire film
Mr. Overlord, I have a expressed a slightly different take on this subject before... Yes, there is more actual pool in the "Hustler" book, than in the movie. But IMO, perhaps that is why the movie was such a well received 'artistic' and commercial success !...It is more about life's dramatic realities, than it is about pool...Much like DeNiro's "Raging Bull" was less about boxing, and more about exposing Jake LaMotta's awkward human frailties.
Even given the fact, that both movies featured the most popular actor's of our time, it is doubtful either movie would have enjoyed the popularity it did, had the emphasis been on pool, or boxing... There are simply too few avid boxing or pool nuts. (like us)...So had either sport been the 'main' focus of either film, the rest of the movie-going world, would have almost certainly said ..."Ho hum" !
It has also been noted, that the only reason Newman got the best actor Oscar for TCOM, is because he had been overlooked for his outstanding performance, in the Hustler, and his many other great roles. Sadly, a movie based strictly on pool, will never be a winner..Even with good actor's.."Pool House Junkies" certainly proved that !!!![]()
How about George C. Scott. How great was he in The Hustler? Watched it again the other night. It gets better and better. I probably watch it every 6 to 8 months. TCOM doesn't hold a candle to The Hustler. Those days are gone.
To make the sequel today....
Vincent is an out of work bum....
He end up at the billiard expo, see's Balabushka's for 10k+
Has it authenticated, and told by high end dealers from the likes of Ken Kerner, and Balabushka expert Mark Kulungan its just a Joss N7. As proof, Vincent is shown a picture of Tom Cruise holding the exact same cue in The Color of Money. In a moment of inspiration, Vincent buys a stack of Tom Cruise stills, signs them himself, and sells to to build up his bank roll.
He sells his, for a bank roll...
Goes to AC and bankrolls his poker championship.
Invests in an AC casino.. ends up broke again...
That would sum it up... :wink:
JV
Don't forget in the movie Paul Newman's character was a shady liquor salesman, substituting brandnames for off labels. So, the Balabushka may not be real.