Comments on Poolology

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's amazing that the people who have argued for years that you cannot use lines through perceived portions of a cue ball and object ball that the developer has spent like 20 years fine tuning, after just a couple of weeks use, are raving about a method that uses only one line through perceived sections of a cue ball and an object ball, that the developer admits breaks down on certain positions on the table.

And they argue over terms like objective and subjective.
 
It's amazing that the people who have argued for years that you cannot use lines through perceived portions of a cue ball and object ball that the developer has spent like 20 years fine tuning, after just a couple of weeks use, are raving about a method that uses only one line through perceived sections of a cue ball and an object ball, that the developer admits breaks down on certain positions on the table.

And they argue over terms like objective and subjective.


I guess it boils down to simplicity. The one line is through the center of both balls -- very easy to visualize. And the breaking down of the system occurs on less than 1% of the table's playing surface.
 
Was this really necessary? Are you capable of debating something without the snide remarks?

Compared to an "old dog" like you, I'm a pup. Glad to see you looking forward to his book. Hope your fading memory doesn't forget by then. :grin:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top