jay helfert said:
Tony, Shannon, Mike Janis, Mike Zuglan, Tommy Kennedy and a few others I haven't named, all running regional events. Good for all of them I say! Go for it boys, and work together whenever possible.
Dagwoodz said:
TAP TAP TAP...but the working together part is what gets them everytime. Some don't play well with others. It doesn't help that they all see each other as competitors....
Dags
Sorry for intruding but Dags is right on the money with his thread.
We are business competitors. We compete for the players, the room owners and the sponsors alike. When the pie is chopped up too much everyone starves. For an example: In the NE Mike Zuglan is already starving for players. His event participation has dropped off considerably as a result of too many competing events/tours. The next step in this progression of downward spiraling events is that the room owners will no longer see a value in having tournaments because the participation numbers in all the tours that compete in a specific region will drop off because of the dividing up of the players. Along with this the sponsors are being divided so each event, room owner and the players will suffer because of a lack of funding.
Its not good. In fact it is real bad for the sport in the long run.
If we had a stable economy and sponsors were lining up to throw money into our sport this wouldn't be a problem. But the sponsors are not and it is a problem. There is no point in having 3-5 tours and events going on in the same region on the same weekend. All its doing is dividing things up and making all the events smaller.
Re: Working together. What a novel idea but it doesn't work. WHY, you ask. Let me tell ya. For this example I will use my tour in the SE region. OK I'm the big tour, I have the bulk of the rooms, players and sponsors. Each of which want me to hold more and more events. OK, not a problem I want more events to. Heck the only time I get paid is when I am doing a tournament. Now you ask me to work with my competitors and not do events on the same weekend they are doing them. If I bow down and agree I don't get paid that week. Now there is another tour so they want a weekend and a third tour and now I only get to do 1 event a month. I barely make a living doing 3 or 4 events a month now you want me to do only 1 event a month.
At the same time this is going on the players are taking a pretty big hit to. Now the players are paying for 4 different tour cards/membership fees and so on. And now while the players are paying more the room owners are getting less. Some of my competitors are only getting an average of 30 some players per event for the same money I charge the room owners and bring them 80 players per event. Now the room owners are starting to feel like they are getting screwed. This is actually good for my business at times. Heck, some of my competitors actually make me look like a god in the RO's eyes. But the problem is after some of the room owners get screwed by the other 3 guys he (the RO) doesn't want anything to do with pool tournaments anymore. When enough of the room owners start to feel this way there will be less and less rooms doing events and less events for the players and less money.
Believe me, too many tours in 1 area is very, very bad for the entire sport.
Whoops, I forgot to mention the sponsors.
Now you have 4 tours in 1 area all calling the same companies to sponsor them. The owners of the companies get used to saying no and now we have less and less sponsors which equals less and less money added to events which equals less and less room owners wanting to host events which equals less and less players making money at events which equals less and less players at events. Its a real bad cycle.
If other want to start more tours they should do it in a region that does not have existing regional tours. This would much better serve our sport as a whole.