I've been playing with this concept as a teaching tool for a little while. Most players tend to look down on throwing balls on the table and running them, but I tend to feel there is a certain usefulness to the routine.
When a player states they want to run a certain number, 50 for example, my first question is "Can you do it while just spreading balls on the table?" In other words, does one have the basic shotmaking ability and consistency to do so without having to worry about clusters and breakshots. If the answer is no, then it's obvious the player needs to fine tune their stroke, alignment etc. However if they can in fact run their target number in this manner with a reasonable degree of regularity, then I would prescribe a higher focus on patterns, break shots, key balls, end patterns etc. etc.
I feel this works well up to a certain point however. If you can run 200-300 throwing balls out on the table, I don't think that necessarily translates into the potential to run over 300 balls (but who knows). But within the 0-100 region it's a good diagnostic tool if used correctly.
When a player states they want to run a certain number, 50 for example, my first question is "Can you do it while just spreading balls on the table?" In other words, does one have the basic shotmaking ability and consistency to do so without having to worry about clusters and breakshots. If the answer is no, then it's obvious the player needs to fine tune their stroke, alignment etc. However if they can in fact run their target number in this manner with a reasonable degree of regularity, then I would prescribe a higher focus on patterns, break shots, key balls, end patterns etc. etc.
I feel this works well up to a certain point however. If you can run 200-300 throwing balls out on the table, I don't think that necessarily translates into the potential to run over 300 balls (but who knows). But within the 0-100 region it's a good diagnostic tool if used correctly.