Cristy Carter

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think they were implying that Kristi was offended (or hurt) by Varney's post claiming the things he claimed, and Varney was offended by her being offended and expressing it here. But take it how you want! You always do! Now... on to more important things; what should I wear to dinner?
 
Hierovision said:
It would be nice not to bash anyone for a while wouldn't it? Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays to everybody. Kristi and Varney especially, they need it :)

For the record, it is not like everyone just come out because they feel like bashing someone; it is a pro player trying to set the record straight when her name (and/or that of her friend) were misrepresented and used repeatedly for commerical gain by a cue maker on a public forum without her consent.

If you would go back and read, no one even mentioned Mr. Varney's name in the beginning of this thread, as this was supposed to be a thread about Kristi Carter.

Somehow Mr. Varney felt the need to promote his work, when someone asked to see pictures of Ms. Kristi Carter.

He started saying Ms. Allison Fisher used his cue in the IPT (we do not know if it was true or not. That aside, since Ms. Allison does have a contract with Cuetec, I think mentioning such a matter on line is a bit inconsiderate to say the least, if he had not consulted with Ms Fisher before hand.)

Shorty after that, he made another claim that Ms. Kristi Carter said his cue was the best she had ever tried (which she never did).

When he was called out, he said he never lied about anything (even though it was obvious that Ms. Carter never said a Varney is the best cue she has ever played with; Ms. Carter believes that a Lambros is the best cue) and went on to tell(threaten?) Ms. Kristi Carter about "talking on the forum" saying he could have told everyone secret he was not supposed to tell. Mr. Varney also described Ms. Carter's post as a comedy show.

As you can see, this is not like everyone coming out of the blue one day and just decides to bash a member.

Mr. Varney, in my opinion, really should not have tried to promote his work on other people's expense as often as he does. To go as far as making up a fraudelent endorsement makes him look very desperate and unethnical. It makes us question if we should trust him again. His behavior is what caused the responses in this thread.

Out of respect to you, I will bow out of this thread. :)

Happy holidays,
Richard
 
Last edited:
ribdoner said:
I feel only one sentence not consisting of more than 5 words should be allowed in SPAM orientated signatures.

C'mon. I'm just trying to tell people "please don't bogart that joint." I'm not trying to sell anything. ;)

Oh wait. Never mind. I only use five words. :o Carry on. :D

Good Rolls,
Rasta <-- Does not sell ganga!
 
Varney Cues said:
Well "Kristi" it looks like I need to refresh your memory a bit and set the record straight. First of all since you are a woman, I'll bite my tongue & try to be as polite as possible. How dare you make a post like that trying to smear my name & make me out to be a liar? I call it like I see it & I tell it exactly like it is, so I'll continue to do so now. If exploiting my work, means telling who I do work for...then yes I do that. But don't call me a liar. I never "painted any pictures about a supposed relationship" between you & I. I stated, and I quote..."that I do your cue work now". And I have been working on your shafts have I not? You were at my home, I installed a new Sniper that you destroyed with a shaper and then brought it back the next day and got something different. It was on that trip that you brought your very nice Mom into my home & I met her. It was also on that visit that you hit quite a few balls with my personal cue on my table. When I asked your thoughts on the cue, you wanted to know what type of cue that was...and you said, and I quote..."that cue is a freak, its hits absolutely wonderful". You then even less than thrilled me when you stated that it played so good that you doubted that I could duplicate it. Then we met again at our mutual friends home and I hit some balls with your cue & you AGAIN stated how well my cue hit. If wanting to share a pros thoughts on my personal cue is "arrogance"...then yes, I'm guilty. If you for some reason feel the need to pour water on that, then so be it. This is how I make a living...what you've done here is along the lines of me setting up near your match table while you are working & starting a loud and rude comedy act...seriously.
Yes you play with Mike's cue...I never said you played with one of mine. From now on...send it back to him when you want it to play better...he does great work & makes a much nicer cue than I.
Sorry if you feel that I exploit my work. In my business I must self promote or fall into the masses of the unknown makers. I've said absolutely nothing untrue. Too bad you feel the need to suddenly pop up and "pour water" on me as you said. I could really lay it out there and tell all I know...but I do NOT! In fact I should go so far as to stop all of my dealings with WPBA players...until you post an apology. But I will not as its not fair to them. I understand you are angry at this thread and rightfully so, but don't put it on me...I did not take the pictures or post them on this public forum!!! I'm disgusted that you try to make me look the part of a liar...thats so unfair & untrue. You say I've "put a couple tips on your ferrule"...you my dear are the one being less than truthful. Do I need to refresh your memory as well on all the shafts I tricked for your break cue. Working on both your playing shafts, more than once, and working on several break cue shafts as I have done...I believe thats as I said..."I do her cue work now". Enjoy...because thats the last work I'll do for you. I could continue to speak and make this an interesting thread...but I'll stop now, bite my tongue and just be the bigger man here and wish you a wonderful Christmas.
KV

This is uncalled for but you probably know that. Is this you or your "ego" talking?
 
Eggnog

Hal said:
In case you're wondering. Popular eggnog recipes include dark rum, bourbon, brandy, and rye.
On our local radio station (WAAF Boston), they had a contest between Ming Tsai (not an eggnog partaker), a Jewish chef/restauranteur whose name escapes me {edit: Michael Schlow}, and the stations morning producer (an idiot).

The two chefs used actual eggs. Ming cooked his in. I"m not sure if the other guy {Michael Schlow} did.

The idiot producer used a carton of Hood Eggnog, mixed it with Kahlua, vodka and ice cream. A frozen White Russian.

Ming's liquor of choice was Frangelica, and he sprinkled ginger and Chinese five spice.

The other chef made two eggnog mixtures using chocolate liqueur and almond liqueur, IIRC.

By most accounts, the two's gourmet eggnogs were the best "eggnog" they ever had, although they were highly departed from the carton style.

Fred <~~~ didn't taste either
 
Last edited:
I agree with Cornerman!!!!!!!!!!

When is enough , enough. What about them Cowboys!!!!!!!!!!!!
Pinocchio
 
Cornerman said:
The two chefs made used actual eggs. Ming cooked his in. I"m not sure if the other guy did.

Fred <~~~ didn't taste either

I remember my father using raw eggs to make eggnog from scratch back when I was a kid. It was, to the best of my memory, the best egg nog I ever had, although I'm sure my glass didn't have the rum portion he put in everyone else's glass.:(
 
Beware of spiked eggnog!!!!!!!!!!!!

I've gotten juiced up on spiked eggnog got so sick I prayed I'd die. I believe I would of rather had the flu. Pure Brutality!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Pinocchio
 
Pinocchio said:
I've gotten juiced up on spiked eggnog got so sick I prayed I'd die. I believe I would of rather had the flu. Pure Brutality!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Pinocchio

SAME--late 70's--NEVER again:eek:
 
Koop said:
Then I think you misunderstood my post. I was in agreement with Fred, not opposed.

Anyhow, have a great holiday.
Koop

It now appears that I misunderstood.I thought u were gigging Fred in a very subtle manner.cheers:cool:
 
Pinocchio said:
When is enough , enough. What about them Cowboys!!!!!!!!!!!!
Pinocchio


I'm gonna hijack the thread and start a new argument >>> If the Cowboys should happen to play the Bears in the NFC playoffs, the score will be somewheres around.....Bears 31 Cowboys 10 .......^_^
 
Pinocchio said:
When is enough , enough. What about them Cowboys!!!!!!!!!!!!
Pinocchio
WHAT ABOUT DEM BEARS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! i love Santa:)
 
1 Pocket Ghost

I'M argumentive by nature an I love the COWBOYS. I know if they play the Bears they will be underdogs. If they were playing today an the spread was 20 I would bet my house. I would either be homeless or build a duplex
in the spring to rent out. Grossman's evil twin could show up on game day
an that would be a bad thing for you. lol
Pinocchio
 
Pinocchio said:
I'M argumentive by nature an I love the COWBOYS. I know if they play the Bears they will be underdogs. If they were playing today an the spread was 20 I would bet my house. I would either be homeless or build a duplex
in the spring to rent out. Grossman's evil twin could show up on game day
an that would be a bad thing for you. lol
Pinocchio
i am offended by your supposed hostile tone.:D
 
Pinocchio said:
What about them Cowboys!!!!!!!!!!!!
Pinocchio

The Cowboys suck. Pack them up and send them to Iraq, maybe they'll put a smile on our troop's faces...:)

-Roger
 
Last edited:
X Breaker said:
Happy holidays,
Richard

Same to you :)

Maybe it's because I'm relatively new here, but here's my personal opinion (I know, everybody wants to know :p )

I've noticed Varney does self-promote a lot (maybe too much by many people's standards), but having one of his playing cues I can say he has at least some reason to. They play very well. If I had never used one of his cues I would be very skeptical (as so many are, rightfully I suppose) about all the self-promoting. BUT, it just seems like any nugget that can be used against him is exploited and stretched to its limit and beyond most of the time. It gets tired. I've found the best solution, if you're getting annoyed by all the self-promoting, is to ignore. If you dislike every post he makes, it only makes sense to add him to your ignore list. Those of you who don't do this, I can only imagine that you enjoy harrassing him. In that case I would leave it up to Varney to do the ignoring. The end. :D
 
Hierovision said:
Same to you :)

Maybe it's because I'm relatively new here, but here's my personal opinion (I know, everybody wants to know :p )

I've noticed Varney does self-promote a lot (maybe too much by many people's standards), but having one of his playing cues I can say he has at least some reason to. They play very well. If I had never used one of his cues I would be very skeptical (as so many are, rightfully I suppose) about all the self-promoting. BUT, it just seems like any nugget that can be used against him is exploited and stretched to its limit and beyond most of the time. It gets tired. I've found the best solution, if you're getting annoyed by all the self-promoting, is to ignore. If you dislike every post he makes, it only makes sense to add him to your ignore list. Those of you who don't do this, I can only imagine that you enjoy harrassing him. In that case I would leave it up to Varney to do the ignoring. The end. :D

You keep bringing up Varney yourself...I thought you want the subject to be dropped? So what if his cues hit good? That makes it okay to lie about professional endorsements?

I don't think anyone should be ignored. You're assuming that adults cannot behave as such, and engage in arguments/debates/sparrings about cues, cuemakers, personalities, politics, music, art...whatever the topic may be.

and I will say this again: Varney has only himself to blame. It's not like I piggybacked on a separate issue in this thread. Kristi Carter validated the EXACT THING that rubs me the wrong way about Kevin Varney. So, I will continue to participate, as long as his little fans---like yourself---keep reviving the topic.

-Roger
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top