You have all the information you need to solve this problem. Let's see if you can figure it out.
...
C'mon Dave, try harder. You're disappointing me. Read your own page, this thread from the beginning and then experiment on the table. Do this and report back. ...
I re-read the entire
CTE resource page and this thread this morning, and I just tried everything again at my table, keeping your diagram particularly in mind. Here's my report, which is interestingly the same as when I first learned about CTE years ago:
the magic is in the pivot.
I still hope you will explain how you don't need to know where the pocket is or how much you need to cut the OB when you are deciding on an alignment and doing your pivot. For convenience, I've repeated the pertinent questions again below.
Regards,
Dave
from previous post:
Are you saying it doesn't matter how much you need to cut the ball?
Here's one of the diagrams from my
November '08 article:
The CB-to-OB distance and alignment are the exact same for every shot in this diagram, and for every possible shot between all of these shots. Yet, the pocket is in a different position (relative to the balls) for each shot. How can the pocket location, and the necessary amount of cut, not matter?
If you line up and pivot the exact same way on all of these shots, most of them will miss the pocket. Even shot "D," which is very close to shot "A," won't go if you use the same alignment and pivot as with shot "A!" (BTW, for shot "D" assume the CB is the still the same distance away from the OB as in shot "A").
I know we have looked at this diagram, or diagrams like it, in many past debates, and we got nowhere. I honestly hope this time might be different.