A while ago I read a thread about what cue a cue maker plays with.
I have thought about this a bit and here is my two cents worth.
I can understand someone thinking that it gives the wrong image to see a cue maker playing pool with a cue made by someone else.
Is his cues not good enough?
Cue makers are like everyone else.
They enjoy playing pool with a good cue no mater who made it.
They admire workmanship in cues made by others and even buy cues they like.
Should they be restricted to playing only with their own cues in public?
No.
All it should say about a cue maker is that he admires the workmanship and/or enjoys playing with that cue.
Or ... perhaps he is checking out the competition to make sure his cues still play better ...
...
I have thought about this a bit and here is my two cents worth.
I can understand someone thinking that it gives the wrong image to see a cue maker playing pool with a cue made by someone else.
Is his cues not good enough?
Cue makers are like everyone else.
They enjoy playing pool with a good cue no mater who made it.
They admire workmanship in cues made by others and even buy cues they like.
Should they be restricted to playing only with their own cues in public?
No.
All it should say about a cue maker is that he admires the workmanship and/or enjoys playing with that cue.
Or ... perhaps he is checking out the competition to make sure his cues still play better ...