this was brought up by a buddy of mine, but i do agree. why is it that a cuemaker whom has pride in his work, create a beautiful piece of art through decades of experience (theirs combined with those whom they learned from), only to finish it off by penning their name or logo with a sharpie with handwriting which resembles that of a 2nd grader? yes i know it's hard to write on something round........
why not go through a little more work to create a logo or at least of all an engraved signature?
This post reminds me of a certain contest on AZB a while back, in which a certain cuemaker (and very good one I think), offered to build a cue for whomever came up with the best idea for his company logo; all fine and good I guess, but to me the entire fiasco shouted a lack of creativity.
Well, probably wrongly on my part I posted something pointing towards lack of originality on the cuemakers part, which I guess pissed him off, (again an error in judgement on my part), but the point I was making was that I felt it detracted from his brand. I reckon he didn't take it that way, but I honestly felt his work was better than that.
I would rather see a legible signature on a cue than a logo, unless it is something that cries originality and craftsmanship in the brand. You never know I guess.
Look at all the Dale Perry cues on ebay, all signed and numbered 1/1, and none will ever have any collector value due to him selling out and cheaponing the brand.
Hell look at Ferrari cars, a guy I used to work for had one, beautiful car, but what a piece of junk it was. Broken down all the time, but worth a hell of a lot of money, cause they know how to market their brand.